Friction Questions: Concepts & Answers

  • Thread starter Thread starter desichick07
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Friction
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the comparison of static and kinetic friction coefficients, specifically noting that the coefficient of static friction is consistently greater than that of kinetic friction. This is attributed to the greater force required to initiate movement from rest compared to maintaining motion. Additionally, the assertion that smoother surfaces always have less friction than rougher surfaces is incorrect; the interaction between surfaces plays a crucial role, and adhesion at the molecular level can lead to exceptions. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding these friction concepts in practical applications.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of static and kinetic friction coefficients
  • Basic knowledge of surface interactions and adhesion
  • Familiarity with experimental measurement techniques in physics
  • Concept of force and motion in classical mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of friction in materials science
  • Explore the role of surface roughness in frictional forces
  • Study the molecular interactions that contribute to adhesion
  • Learn about experimental methods for measuring friction coefficients
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics or engineering, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in the practical applications of friction in material interactions.

desichick07
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
I am having trouble with two concept questions.

We did a lab measuring static and dynamic friction for cardboard, rubber, sandpaper, and cork with a wood block.
Calculations show that the coefficient of static friction is always greater that that of kinetic friction.

The questions are:
a) How do the coeffients of static and kinetic frictions compare? Explain.
My answer was that the coeff. of static friction is always greater, reason being that it takes a greater force to get an object to start moving from rest (acceleration), which is when static f. was measured, versus just keeping an object moving (a = 0).

b) Do "smoother" surfaces always have less friction than "rougher" ones?
Ans: No, because it depends on the other surface they are interacting with??

I have tried to answer them, but if someone could just check and point out what is wrong I would appreciate it. I think i got the first question right but I'm pretty sure the second one is wrong.I really don't know how to answer b.
What are the concepts behind the second one? Because i truly don't even know where to start with that.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You must have learned from the lab, right? A rough surface can have a smaller coefficient of friction than a smooth one. The ultimate source of friction is adhesion between groups of molecules and a smooth surface can put a lot more molecules in close proximity than a rough one. There are, of course, exceptions to every rule, but to say ALWAYS is just plain wrong. Your answer is right.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K