Why Hydrogen is the Only Fuel for Fuel Cells

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the use of hydrogen as the primary fuel for fuel cells, exploring whether other substances, such as nitrogen and oxygen, can be utilized. Participants examine the mechanics of fuel cells, the types of fuels that can be used, and the implications of using various gases in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the assertion that only hydrogen can be used in fuel cells, seeking clarification on the reasoning behind this claim.
  • Another participant compares fuel cells to car engines, suggesting that they are designed to operate on specific fuels.
  • A participant inquires about the feasibility of creating a fuel cell that operates on nitrogen and oxygen, prompting further discussion.
  • Some participants assert that there are fuel cells capable of running on hydrocarbon fuels, such as methanol and ethanol, and clarify that fuel cells utilize protons from hydrogen-containing compounds.
  • Concerns are raised about the toxicity of nitrogen oxides (NOx) produced from certain fuel cell reactions, with one participant noting that nitrogen is inert and irrelevant to fuel cells.
  • There is a discussion about the nature of inert gases, with participants exploring the reactivity of nitrogen and the concept of inertness in relation to electron configurations.
  • Some participants express uncertainty about the details of chemical reactions involving nitrogen and the conditions under which it can react.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the exclusivity of hydrogen as a fuel for fuel cells, with some asserting that other fuels can be used while others maintain that hydrogen is essential. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the potential for nitrogen and oxygen to be utilized in fuel cells.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the assumptions about fuel cell operation, the definitions of inert gases, and the specifics of chemical reactions involving nitrogen. These aspects are not fully explored or agreed upon.

Imparcticle
Messages
572
Reaction score
4
My chemistry book says it is impossible to use anything but hydrogen in a fuel cell, but does not say why. does anyone know why?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Thats just how the engine works. Just like your car engine will only run on gasoline, that's what its designed to run on.
 
my friend wants to know if its possible to make a fuel cell that runs on nitrogen and oxygen. Is that possible?
 
Your book is wrong. There exist a whole class of fuel cells that can run on other hydrocarbon fuels. So-called direct methanol and direct ethanol fuel cells can operate from methanol and ethanol.

Fuel cells are really just devices with semipermeable membranes that are permeable to protons (hydrogen ions) but not to electrons. It doesn't matter where these protons come from, either molecular hydrogen or some other hydogen-containing compound.

Nitrogen and oxygen, of course, contain no hydrogen. They cannot be used in a fuel cell. I should also note that oxygen is used in all fuel cells as the "hydrogen acceptor." Nitrogen itself is an inert gas and has no relevance to fuel cells. Even more importantly, such a fuel cell would actually produce very toxic NOx compounds as exhaust. That's not exactly the direction we'd like to see energy production going.

- Warren
 
Hmm... I though it could only run on hydrogen and oxygen. Neat.
 
http://www.cfdrc.com/applications/fuelcells/dmfc.html

- Warren
 
Last edited by a moderator:
don't forget phosphate FCs, carbonate FCs, and solid oxide FCs

http://www.chuden.co.jp/english/corporation/press/pre2000/pre0911.html
http://www1.elsevier.com/vj/fuelcell/show/latest_toc.htt
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Correct me if I'm mistaken here, but don't all these different types fo fuel cells just extract the Hydrogen from these fuels, and then run on Hydrogen and Oxygen?
 
actually produce very toxic NOx

why is it toxic? what makes a gas inert?
 
  • #10
LURCH said:
Correct me if I'm mistaken here, but don't all these different types fo fuel cells just extract the Hydrogen from these fuels, and then run on Hydrogen and Oxygen?
That was my interpretation of Imparticle's chemistry book. It may be an oversimplification the way its written, but it is technically true.
 
  • #11
Imparcticle said:
why is it toxic?
"Toxic" just means "poisonous." I'm not sure if you are looking for how exactly it effects the body, but I'm pretty sure they displace oxygen.
what makes a gas inert?
Inert means non-reactive. Oxygen likes to burn, so its not inert. Nitrogen doesn't react with much of anything (when in diatomic gas form), so it is. There are varying derees though...
 
  • #12
how does nitrogen occur naturally? (monoatomic?)

Inert means non-reactive. Oxygen likes to burn, so its not inert. Nitrogen doesn't react with much of anything (when in diatomic gas form), so it is. There are varying derees though...

BUT what makes it inert? i know what inert means, I just don't know what makes gases inert. Does it have something to do with the electron orbits?
 
  • #13
nitrogen is about 3/4 of the atmosphere, more or less, and it is diatomic

yes, in effect, all the other fuel cells mentioned use hydrogen but react it with something other than diatomic oxygen

here is a better description http://fuelcells.si.edu/basics.htm
 
  • #14
Imparcticle said:
BUT what makes it inert? i know what inert means, I just don't know what makes gases inert. Does it have something to do with the electron orbits?
Yes, chemical reactions are all about electrons. IIRC, the "noble gases" are the most inert because they have their outer shells completely filled, meaning they have no spaces to accept electrons, nor extra electrons to give. I'm not sure about the electron config of nitrogen (not a noble gas).
 
  • #15
As I understand, nitrogen is inert because the triple covalent bond (?) that it's usually in already is so strong. You can get it to react with something else (that's where you get ammonium and TNT), but it's hard.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
8K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 96 ·
4
Replies
96
Views
14K
Replies
69
Views
20K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K