Full Wave Rectifier, Ripple Voltage?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the analysis of a Full Wave Bridge Rectifier circuit, specifically focusing on the calculation of maximum voltage (Vmax) and ripple voltage (Vripple). Participants explore the implications of component values on the performance of the circuit, including the effects of load resistance and capacitance.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the circuit parameters and attempts to calculate Vmax and Vripple, expressing uncertainty about the time constant (Tau) calculation.
  • Another participant suggests that the diode forward voltage drop (Vf) may be underestimated and provides an alternative method for calculating ripple voltage using current and time.
  • A third participant questions the adequacy of the capacitance value (CL) for minimizing ripple, indicating that a 1μF capacitor may be too small for the given load.
  • Further clarification is provided that the ripple voltage calculation method is only approximate and may not hold if the ripple is large.
  • One participant notes that with a 500Ω load, the capacitor's effect can be disregarded, indicating a significant ripple due to the small capacitance.
  • A participant realizes a misunderstanding between the time constant and the period, leading to errors in their calculations and discusses the design's intent to learn from poor performance.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the adequacy of the capacitor value and the accuracy of the ripple voltage calculations. There is no consensus on the best approach to calculate Vripple, and multiple perspectives on the implications of the circuit design remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in their calculations, such as the assumption of constant load current and the potential inaccuracy of ripple voltage formulas when ripple is large. The discussion also reflects on the design choices made for educational purposes.

Naptime
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Full Wave Bridge Rectifier circuit

four-diode-full-wave%20bridge-rectifier_7-3.jpg


Basically this circuit, but ZL is r//c not simply r as it is in this circuit (also, disregard any values... just the model is relevant)
Vs=6.5cost(2pi60t)
CL=1μF
RL=500Ω

I'm trying to find Vmax and Vripple.

Homework Equations



Vmax = Vdc-2Von
Vr = (Vmax Tau) / (2RC)

Tau = 1/f <-- This must be wrong but it's the only Time constant equation I have.



The Attempt at a Solution



Vmax = Vdc-2Von = 6.5 - 2(.5) = 5.5v
Tau = 1/f = 1/60 = .0166
Vr = (Vmax Tau) / (2RC) = 5.5 * Tau / (2(500)(1x10-6) = 91.6

My output graph (generated using SPICE) shows a sinusoid from around .2ish to 5ish Vo so clearly 91 Vripple is wrong. There should be a Vripple of about 5v to achieve this specific Vo. I'm 95% that my error is in the Tau calculation but I just can't find any info in my book/web about it.

Any help is appreciated, ty.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First off 0.5 is a bit low for Vf of the diodes.

As for the ripple. I use..

Q=VC

differentiate to give

I=CdV/dt

rearrange to give

dV = Idt/C

So then need to find approx I and dt...

if V=5V and R = 500 Ohms

I=V/R
= 0.01Amps

dt is approx
1/(60*2) = 0.008s

so
dV = 0.01 * 0.008 / 1*10-6
= 80V

Except it can't be 80V as that's >> 5V.

In other words the capacitor is not big enough to remove any significant ripple. The ripple is therefore roughly same as the AC waveform. That appears to be what Spice is telling you.
 
Last edited:
Hi Naptime. http://img96.imageshack.us/img96/5725/red5e5etimes5e5e45e5e25.gif
Naptime said:
CL=1μF
RL=500Ω

I'm trying to find Vmax and Vripple.
Check that you have the correct value for CL.

If CL is not large enough to produce small ripple, then the ripple will be large and the approximations involved in deriving Vr = (Vmax Tau) / (2RC)[/color] do not apply, hence that formula does not apply. CL of 1 μF is way too small to do anything useful here.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
ps: The above method I used for calculating the ripple is only very approximate. It assumes the load is roughly constant current. That's a valid approximation when the ripple is small. If the ripple voltage is large it's not an accurate method.

However in this case the ripple appears so large and larger than the supply voltage that accuracy isn't that important.
 
With a 500 ohm load you can effectively disregard the capacitor. Just assume the transformer is ideal and away you go. You won't get "constant load current" or anything near it with Cload = 1μF and Rload = 500Ω.

Different story, and much more complicated, if Rload = 12K as shown in the figure. There the rolloff is at ~ 13Hz and you're running 60Hz input voltage.
 
OK I figured it out. Basically I was confusing Tau for T. Time constant and the period were the same thing in my calculations which threw everything off. This was basically a design where the output was designed poorly (on purpose so that we could learn to fix it). When Vo is ~ Vin the rectifier wasn't doing it's job. Basically the purpose is the flip the bottom half of the sinusoid to "mirror" the positive side and to do so the filter needed to be above a specific range (using the Vr equation in the first post, recalculate for C). If anyone needs me to fully rework this let me know, but with the help of those who responded and my TA I was able to redesign the circuit given the criteria. Ty.
 
Naptime said:
OK I figured it out. Basically I was confusing Tau for T. Time constant and the period were the same thing in my calculations which threw everything off. This was basically a design where the output was designed poorly (on purpose so that we could learn to fix it). When Vo is ~ Vin the rectifier wasn't doing it's job. Basically the purpose is the flip the bottom half of the sinusoid to "mirror" the positive side and to do so the filter needed to be above a specific range (using the Vr equation in the first post, recalculate for C). If anyone needs me to fully rework this let me know, but with the help of those who responded and my TA I was able to redesign the circuit given the criteria. Ty.

Good job. have a nice nap, Ty! :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
8K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
23K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
25K
Replies
17
Views
4K