I am producing a series of 'debates' between myself and my physics 12 students. I feel strongly that their ability to logically conceptualize their ideas and debate them is an important par of the class. Therefore i will argue against groups of four who must argue against a flat earth, moon hoax theories, and other more generic pseudo scientific topics. I will always take the 'pro' side of the quackery. so part of preparation for my own argument is to build up my argument that the Earth is flat. it has involved myself going through a huge range of flat Earth videos. it has been mind numbing.
most of the flat Earth debates have been almost entirely around an argumentation by presenting attacks on a heliocentric solar system and round Earth concept, rather than PROVING the flat Earth one. it avoids suggesting how a flat Earth conceptual model actually accounts for all of the phenomena we observe. Many flat earthers will suggest that gravity itself is not a real thing quite readily without suggesting how alternate theories work BETTER. and this is key - and something all students should internalize. This is not about disproving something. it is about offering an alternate model that will work better than the one already proposed.
so for example, the idea of building a flat Earth model [as suggested earlier in this thread] and asking "OK, do the shadows that the model predicts actually jive with real life observations?"
this is a fantastic idea, which allows for some really fun possibilities. you could have students in different schools around the globe simultaneously measure [well as long as they have sunlight, anyway] and determine the angles they have found. those angles can be used to determine if near proximity sun actually is predicted, or if they suggest parallel lines from a spherical surface. a littel geometry is needed - but fun to play with