Function Group vs. Mechanisms approach (Organic Chemistry)

bacte2013
Messages
394
Reaction score
57
Hello!

For those who took (or have been taking) the organic chemistry, which methodology do you prefer to tackle the mechanism and prediction questions? I have been reading Loudon & Wade (functional group-based) and Clayden (mechanism-based), but I feel like the mechanism-based approach is more useful when predicting the organic reactions...I am just curious about your opinions...

Thanks!
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
I guess it would be a combination of sorts. First would be the question is this an Sn1, Sn2, E1, or E2. From there you get a good idea of the role each reactant. Next, I like to remind myself of what type of starting material is this reaction is describing (i.e. Aldehyde, ketone, amine, ether, etc.); and is it primary, secondary, or tertiary. From there you can determine the rate limiting step of the reaction and subsequently the theoretical yields of each isomer produced. Is this what you are asking?
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K