Functional Analysis exchange year at Imperial

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the potential exchange year at Imperial College, specifically regarding the Functional Analysis (FA) course. Participants express a generally positive view of Imperial, highlighting its strong academic reputation, resources, and faculty-to-student ratio, which fosters connections with professors and peers. While there are concerns about the FA course being abstract and requiring significant initial investment, it is noted that FA is essential for understanding various advanced topics in physics, such as partial differential equations and stochastic processes. The conversation suggests that students should not overly focus on one course and encourages seeking advice from student advisors for more tailored information. Additionally, the relationship between FA and stochastic processes is briefly explored, emphasizing the theoretical connections without deeming FA absolutely necessary for studying stochastic processes. Overall, the sentiment leans towards embracing the exchange experience despite any reservations about specific courses.
George444fg
Messages
25
Reaction score
4
Hey,

I would like to do an exchange year at Imperial. I would like to follow as a physicist the Functional Analysis course. However, I have not heard the best things about this peculiar course. What is the audience opinion on that?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi, @George444fg no personal experience, but yes a personal impression: go ahead, Imperial is on top among international universities
Good Luck!
 
I had a good experience at Imperial College and would recommend it if you can get in. I studied electronics engineering although I really enjoyed PhySoc and mingled with the students there too. The university has a lot of resources and I felt like the classes were taught well. I felt like it had a good faculty to student ratio so it was easier to conenct with the professors (even some research opportunities); I was also surrounded by a bunch of very talented students and built some good relationships to help each other (I would like to think I was helpful too 🙃).

I don't know much about the class you're asking about probably because of my major, but I didn't hear any of my friends complain about it. Given the above... though... I personally wouldn't get caught up over one (or two) classes.
 
  • Like
Likes S.G. Janssens
George444fg said:
peculiar course
😳😂

Where I studied, students in theoretical physics would usually take an introductory FA course.

How "peculiar" it is from a physics student's point of view, I don't know. Probably the complaint is that it is abstract, requiring initial time investment before it can be applied to concrete problems. Whether or not that is a problem, is in the eye of the beholder.

On the other hand, FA is the language commonly used for the mathematical study of subjects such as partial differential equations, stochastic processes, or operator algebras. It can be taught in different ways, even at the introductory level.

So if you want more specific advice, you can post the course description and prerequisites here. Or even better: Discuss the course description with your student advisors.

In addition to that, as Joshy said: Don't get caught up over one class. Enjoy the exchange.
 
S.G. Janssens said:
😳😂

Where I studied, students in theoretical physics would usually take an introductory FA course.

How "peculiar" it is from a physics student's point of view, I don't know. Probably the complaint is that it is abstract, requiring initial time investment before it can be applied to concrete problems. Whether or not that is a problem, is in the eye of the beholder.

On the other hand, FA is the language commonly used for the mathematical study of subjects such as partial differential equations, stochastic processes, or operator algebras. It can be taught in different ways, even at the introductory level.

So if you want more specific advice, you can post the course description and prerequisites here. Or even better: Discuss the course description with your student advisors.

In addition to that, as Joshy said: Don't get caught up over one class. Enjoy the exchange.
Just curious as to how FA is related to Stochastic Processes?
 
WWGD said:
Just curious as to how FA is related to Stochastic Processes?
There are many relations, and I am sure you know at least some of them. Some examples, in brief:

On the more general level of probability theory, there are ##L^p(\Omega,\Sigma,\mu)## spaces of ##p##-integrable (##\mu##-equivalence classes of) functions on a probability space ##(\Omega,\Sigma,\mu)##.

What probabilists usually call "weak convergence" or "convergence in distribution" is really a form of weak##\star## convergence in a topological dual space.

More specifically, with certain continuous time Markov processes you can associate an infinitesimal generator. This gives a connection between the theory of stochastic processes and the functional analytic theory of operator semigroups, since properties of the process may be studied by studying the infinitesimal generator.

(By the way, I don't think FA is indispensable for studying stochastic processes, but it is indispensable for understanding a considerable part of the work done by others. The same applies to some extent to the connection between FA and PDEs. You can perfectly well do beautiful things in PDEs using classical "hard" analysis, but a lot of work does use the language of FA.)
 
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
I have a specialization in condensed matter physics and materials physics, and off-late, I have been seeing a lot of research directions moving towards quantum computing (AMO and non-linear optics) and the huge chunk of quantum materials research (and funding) is dedicated towards QIS and QC research. I am wondering (sort of in a dilemma), if I should consider switching my field? I am currently at the stage of a postdoc.

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Back
Top