Functional Analysis or Differential Geometry?

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the choice between a functional analysis course and a differential geometry course for a mathematics undergraduate focusing on physics. The participant has previously taken a foundational functional analysis course and is considering the advanced version, while also being drawn to a well-presented differential geometry course. Concerns include the effectiveness of self-study versus assessment-based learning and the potential impact on future advanced courses like quantum mechanics and general relativity. Ultimately, advice from local professors suggests that differential geometry may be more relevant for understanding general relativity and classical mechanics, leading to the decision to pursue the differential geometry course. The conversation highlights the importance of aligning course choices with academic and career goals in physics.
AXidenT
Messages
26
Reaction score
2
I'm in my last semester of my undergraduate majoring in mathematics (focusing on mathematical physics I guess - I'm one subject short of having a physics major) and am wondering, largely from a physics perspective if it would be better to do a functional analysis course or a differential geometry course?

I took the first functional analysis course last semester, though the majority of this was topology, metric spaces and a little on Banach and other more structured spaces at the end. This semesters functional analysis cours eis a 4th year course that continues from the previous one and does more actual functional analysis (Hilbert Spaces etc...).

Alternatively there is the 3rd year differential geometry course which mainly sounds like it is contained in R^n. I've been going to lectures for both and the DG lectures are better presented for me and I also have a comprehensive functional analysis book I was given a year ago as a present - my worry is I don't get the same experience with self study as I do doing assessment.

I probably can't take whichever course I don't do now next year in honours. To give some context courses I'm looking at next year include advanced quantum (introduces relativistic and field theory), general relativity, measure theory and algebraic topology.

Any suggestions on which course I should take? I feel functional analysis is really important, but I haven't really been exposed to much geometry before either...

Thanks for any help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It depends on what your goals and aspirations are. Explain those to some local profs who can give you better advice than we probably can.
 
I feel differential geometry is more important than functional analysis. Differential geometry is important in GR, and even in stuff like classical mechanics and others. Functional analysis is mainly important in rigorous quantum stuff.
 
After speaking to a few lecturers and what not I think I will keep DG - thanks for the advice!
 
TL;DR: Jackson or Zangwill for Electrodynamics? Hi, I want to learn ultrafast optics and I am interested in condensed matter physics, ie using ultrafast optics in condensed matter systems. However, before I get onto ultrafast optics I need to improve my electrodynamics knowledge. Should I study Jackson or Zangwill for Electrodynamics? My level at the moment is Griffiths. Given my interest in ultrafast optics in condensed matter, I am not sure which book is better suited for me. If...

Similar threads

Replies
41
Views
7K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K