Functional analysis, ortho basis, weakly convergent

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

This discussion revolves around a problem from functional analysis, specifically focusing on weak convergence in the context of Hilbert spaces and the properties of orthonormal bases. The original poster expresses confusion regarding the differences between l^2 and L^2 spaces, as well as the implications of weak convergence.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the implications of weak convergence and the role of orthonormal bases in Hilbert spaces. There is an exploration of Parseval's identity and its connection to weak convergence. Questions arise regarding the treatment of sequences and summations in the context of convergence.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the nature of weak convergence and suggested using Parseval's identity. There is ongoing exploration of how to approach the second part of the problem, with various interpretations being discussed. No explicit consensus has been reached, but productive lines of reasoning are being examined.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the need for clarity on the definitions and properties of weak convergence, as well as the boundedness of certain sequences. The discussion reflects uncertainty about how to apply these concepts to the specific problem at hand.

Fellowroot
Messages
92
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



problem%205.26_zpsxlq56zgm.png


This is a problem from Haim Brezis's functional analysis book.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm assuming (e)n is the vectors like (e)1 = (1,0,0), (e)2=(0,1,0) and so on.

We know every hilbert space has an orthonormal basis.

I also need to know the difference between l^2 and L^2 spaces. I know that this might not be much of a solution, but I'm really stuck.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You could start by stating clearly what weak convergence implies (here in the context of a Hilbert space).

Once you have a clear understanding of weak convergence, 1. and 2. shouldn't be too difficult.
As (##e_n)## is an orthornormal basis of the Hilbert space H, you can use ## \forall x \in H: x= \sum_{i=1}^\infty <x,e_i>e_i## (series converging in the norm of the Hilbert space).
And also ##\forall x \in H:|x|²=\sum_{i=1}^\infty |<x,e_i>|²##.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Greg Bernhardt
Thanks.

I think I now have the answer to part 1 because you can use an idea from Parseval which automically shows that en weakly converges to zero. But I'm still not sure about what to do with an and un. I also think the boundedness of an plays a role.

For part 2 I know that this is showing strongly convergence, but I don't really get how to show abs(un). Do I just pretend that the summation is really a sequence?
 
Fellowroot said:
I think I now have the answer to part 1 because you can use an idea from Parseval which automically shows that en weakly converges to zero.
Yes, that is correct.
Fellowroot said:
For part 2 I know that this is showing strongly convergence, but I don't really get how to show abs(un). Do I just pretend that the summation is really a sequence?
You can compute an upper bound for ##|u_n|##, making use of the fact that ##(a_n)## is bounded, and ##(e_n)## orthonormal.
You can use that, in general, you have:
##|\sum_{i=1}^n b_ie_i|²=\sum_{i=1}^n |b_i|²## (where ##(b_i)## are any numbers), because ##(e_n)## is orthonormal.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
706
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K