Fundamental Misunderstanding of SR…?

  • Thread starter Thread starter member 545369
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fundamental Sr
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around a space explorer traveling at 0.9c to a star 4 light years away, where the explorer calculates the distance as 1.7 light years using the Lorentz contraction formula, L = L0 / γ. The explorer incorrectly computes the time taken, Δt, as 10.2 years instead of the correct value of 1.9 years, due to a misunderstanding of the relationship between proper time (Δt0) and dilated time (Δt). The error is clarified through peer feedback, emphasizing the importance of correctly applying relativistic equations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of special relativity concepts, particularly Lorentz contraction and time dilation.
  • Familiarity with the Lorentz factor (γ) and its calculation.
  • Knowledge of proper time (Δt0) versus dilated time (Δt) in relativistic scenarios.
  • Basic algebra skills for manipulating equations related to physics problems.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and applications of the Lorentz factor (γ) in special relativity.
  • Learn how to accurately calculate proper time (Δt0) and dilated time (Δt) in various relativistic contexts.
  • Explore additional examples of relativistic motion to reinforce understanding of time dilation and length contraction.
  • Investigate common misconceptions in special relativity to avoid similar errors in problem-solving.
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching special relativity, and anyone interested in understanding the implications of traveling at relativistic speeds.

member 545369

Homework Statement


A space explorer travels in a spaceship with v = 0.9c. She goes from Earth to a distant star that is 4 light years away (again, measured from Earth). What is the distance measured by the explorer and how long will she say it took her to get there?

Homework Equations


##L=\frac {L_0} {\gamma}## , ##\Delta t = \Delta t_0 \gamma##

The Attempt at a Solution


I solved the first part perfectly fine and got the answer of ##L = 1.7## light years. When solving for ##\Delta t## I realized that I didn't have ##\Delta t_0##. No problem! I just solved the equation ##\frac {L_0} v## for ##\Delta t_0## and got a value of ##\frac {40} {9}## years. Since ##\gamma \approx 2.3## I just multiplied ##2.3## by ##\frac {40} {9}## and got a value of ##10.2## years. The actual value is 1.9 years, which happens to also be ##\frac {\Delta t_0} {\gamma}## but I don't see why I'm wrong!

NOTE: I know that there is another solution to this problem and perhaps it is a bit simpler. I would like to focus on what's wrong with my thought process and fix THAT rather than try to adapt to another method of solving.

EDIT: Figured out my mistake :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
EDIT: Figured out my mistake :)
Well done - what was it?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
3K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K