Fundamental note vs fundamental frequency of string

In summary: If you pluck at the 1/4 point, you excite both the first and second resonances (and also higher ones).2. If you pluck at the 1/4 and also touch the string at the mid point, you prevent the vibration of the fundamental frequency and the sound is mainly the 2nd resonance.3. Stopping the string 1/4 from the end creates a standing wave.4. The effect of plucking is to shorten the string.
  • #1
somecelxis
121
0

Homework Statement


A guitr player changes the frequncy of the note produced by a guitar string by pressing his fingers along the string. The fundamental frequency of the string is 264hz. What are the frquncies of the fundamental note if the player plucked the string at 1/4 of the way from one end?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


my ans is fundamental freuqncy of note = fundamental frequncy of string which is 264hz. but the ans is 352hz. why is it so?
what's the diffrence between fundamental freuqncy of note and fundamental frequncy of string actually?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I think the problem has a typo - they do not mean "plucked".
If the string is pressed 1/4 of the way from the end - what frequency does it play?
 
  • #3
Two answers are required. One is the answer you were given. The other is > 352 Hz.

Assume no change in string tension when the string is pressed or plucked.
 
  • #4
what's the diffrence between fundamental freuqncy of note and fundamental frequncy of string actually?
 
  • #5
Simon Bridge said:
I think the problem has a typo - they do not mean "plucked".
If the string is pressed 1/4 of the way from the end - what frequency does it play?

If the string is pressed 1/4 of the way from the end , the frequency that's being played is 264 x 2 =528hz (first overtone occur)
 
  • #6
somecelxis said:
If the string is pressed 1/4 of the way from the end , the frequency that's being played is 264 x 2 =528hz (first overtone occur)

Explain your working.
 
  • #7
NascentOxygen said:
Explain your working.

when the string is plucked at 1/4 of its end , first overtone( 2nd resonsnace ) occur. when the string is plucked at 1/2 of its end , fundamnetal node produced. (1st resonance)
 
  • #8
somecelxis said:
If the string is pressed 1/4 of the way from the end , the frequency that's being played is 264 x 2 =528hz (first overtone occur)

You now have two separate strings, effectively.

Unfortunately, neither one gives 528 Hz.

What formula relates frequency to length, tension and linear mass density?
Then, realize that when you push on a string the only thing that changes is length. And as I said there are now effectively two strings so possibly two separate frequencies.
 
  • #9
somecelxis said:
when the string is plucked at 1/4 of its end , first overtone( 2nd resonsnace ) occur.

If you pluck at the 1/4 point, you excite both the first and second resonances (and also higher ones).

If you pluck at the 1/4 and also touch the string at the mid point, you prevent the vibration of the fundamental frequency and the sound is mainly the 2nd resonance.

But that has nothing to do with the OP's question.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #10
somecelxis said:
If the string is pressed 1/4 of the way from the end , the frequency that's being played is 264 x 2 =528hz (first overtone occur)
No - I mean: what is the physical effect on the string?

A standing wave happens when waves reflect off the ends of the string, come back, and interfere with each other. You should have this in yur notes.

When you press part of the string to a surface, your finger prevents the vibration reaching some of the string. The waves reflect off your finger instead of reflecting off the far end of the string.

The effect is to have made the string shorter.

The question is making a distinction between the fundamental for the whole string and the fundamental for the note that is being played by pressing on the string while plucking.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #11
rude man said:
Two answers are required. One is the answer you were given. The other is > 352 Hz.

Assume no change in string tension when the string is pressed or plucked.

It's a guitar. When you "stop" the string 1/4 from the end, you don't pluck it behind the (finger) stop.

Edit: Although I suppose you could be playing a note very high on the fingerboard, in which case a physicist might interpret 1/4 from the end as being 1/4 from the bridge instead of the nut. I don't think a guitar player would ever interpret it that way, though.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #12
AlephZero said:
If you pluck at the 1/4 point, you excite both the first and second resonances (and also higher ones).

The "plucking" question is more interesting than the "stopping" question… but then the original question ought to ask what are the fundamental frequencies produced.
 
  • #13
AlephZero said:
If you pluck at the 1/4 point, you excite both the first and second resonances (and also higher ones).

If you pluck at the 1/4 and also touch the string at the mid point, you prevent the vibration of the fundamental frequency and the sound is mainly the 2nd resonance.

But that has nothing to do with the OP's question.
It's a different way of describing it - i.e. in terms of the modes of vibration of the overall string.
It is important to distinguish between the effect of plucking and pressing+plucking.

I want to emphasize some of your points that may get lost on a quick read through:
- In a guitar string, there is significant enough damping for overtones to quickly vanish ... so you have to press then pluck.
- Press first and it is possible to excite tones which are not modes of the whole string - though it is possible to describe them as a sum of those modes.
- any wave on the string can be represented as a sum of modes. When described like this, pressing on the fret-board is, mathematically, selecting available modes.

However:
Could it be more direct to consider that pressing on the fret-board changes the effective length of the string? Then you can treat the string as playing the fundamental for the effective length?
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #14
Simon Bridge said:
- In a guitar string, there is significant enough damping for overtones to quickly vanish
That's not true. The way you excite individual harmonics is by touching the string at a nodal point (1/2, 1/3, 1/4, etc, along the length) when you pluck, not by pressing the string onto the fingerboard. You can then release the "touching" finger and the harmonic will continue almost as long as a normal note.

Here's a demo. (Skip to about 1:30 if you want to cut to the chase). I think somecelxis was getting confused about exciting harmonics in this way.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mZ6HKrFFM_4

any wave on the string can be represented as a sum of modes. When described like this, pressing on the fret-board is, mathematically, selecting available modes.

You can to represent the shape of a string that is partly vibrating and partlly static as a Fourier series, but the you can't represent the vibration at a different frequency in that way. (Well, not without getting way ahead of the level of the OP's question).

When you press the string against the fingerboard, you change the boundary conditions of the vibration problem, and it is much easier to
consider that pressing on the fret-board changes the effective length of the string? Then you can treat the string as playing the fundamental for the effective length
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #15
Simon Bridge said:
No - I mean: what is the physical effect on the string?

A standing wave happens when waves reflect off the ends of the string, come back, and interfere with each other. You should have this in yur notes.

When you press part of the string to a surface, your finger prevents the vibration reaching some of the string. The waves reflect off your finger instead of reflecting off the far end of the string.

The effect is to have made the string shorter.

The question is making a distinction between the fundamental for the whole string and the fundamental for the note that is being played by pressing on the string while plucking.

thanks for telling me that When you press part of the string to a surface, your finger prevents the vibration reaching some of the string. The waves reflect off your finger instead of reflecting off the far end of the string.
if the question ask for 2nd resonance of string (first overtone) . isn't that euqla to 528hz?
 
  • #16
Simon Bridge said:
No - I mean: what is the physical effect on the string?

A standing wave happens when waves reflect off the ends of the string, come back, and interfere with each other. You should have this in yur notes.

When you press part of the string to a surface, your finger prevents the vibration reaching some of the string. The waves reflect off your finger instead of reflecting off the far end of the string.

The effect is to have made the string shorter.

The question is making a distinction between the fundamental for the whole string and the fundamental for the note that is being played by pressing on the string while plucking.

by saying that The waves reflect off your finger instead of reflecting off the far end of the string.


do you mean the frequncy of sound played is only affected by the length of string from the finger plucked to the right node? this is not affected by the length of left node to the hand plucked?
 
  • #17
somecelxis said:
thanks for telling me that When you press part of the string to a surface, your finger prevents the vibration reaching some of the string. The waves reflect off your finger instead of reflecting off the far end of the string.
if the question ask for 2nd resonance of string (first overtone) . isn't that euqla to 528hz?
No. No. No. The string has now changed. By holding it down firmly it at some point along its length you have created a new string. This new string is shorter than the old string, so it has a new fundamental frequency of vibration (and, in turn, it follows that it has also a new overtone).
 
  • #18
The fundamental frequency corresponds to the mode with only 2 nodes — one at each end of the vibrating string. Thus the fundamental frequency is only affected by the distance between the nodes, which you have altered by pushing the string down behind a fret with your left hand. Now you have a shorter string which has its left end at the fret.

Overtones correspond to modes with extra nodes in the middle—they will have frequencies which are multiples of the (new) fundamental. How the string was plucked tends to change which overtones get excited, but it doesn't change the list of overtone frequencies.
 
  • #19
my book give wehn the string is plucked at l / (2n) , n##f_0## produced , which n##f_0## = first ,second overtone and etc , n= 2,3,4...
this is making me confused. what's the diffrence between the note in photo and what you've said earlier?
 

Attachments

  • DSC_0065.jpg
    DSC_0065.jpg
    27 KB · Views: 360
Last edited:
  • #20
All the overtones produced are multiples of ##f_0##, the fundamental frequency. At the moment of release (after plucking), the string contains a mix of all the overtones (in varying amounts).
 
  • #21
AlephZero said:
If you pluck at the 1/4 point, you excite both the first and second resonances (and also higher ones).

If you pluck at the 1/4 and also touch the string at the mid point, you prevent the vibration of the fundamental frequency and the sound is mainly the 2nd resonance.

But that has nothing to do with the OP's question.

what do you mean by pluck the string only , plucked and touch on string ?
 
  • #22
"Touch" is not a good word. "Press" is better. You need to effectively stop the vibrations at the point of touch.

If you press at the 1/4 point you now have 2 strings instead of one. For each segment the basic formula for f applies. If L was the original length you now have a string of length L/4 and a second string of length 3L/4. So you get two frequencies, one for each segment. Usually the longer segment is the only one plucked (I think).

It does not matter where along a given segment the string is plucked. The frequency is the same.
 
  • #23
rude man said:
"Touch" is not a good word. "Press" is better. You need to effectively stop the vibrations at the point of touch.
I believe what AlephZero was talking about is playing a "harmonic" note, in which case the object is to induce a node at a certain point on the string but not kill the vibrations behind the finger. If so, it is definitely "touch" and not "press."
 
  • #24
olivermsun said:
I believe what AlephZero was talking about is playing a "harmonic" note, in which case the object is to induce a node at a certain point on the string but not kill the vibrations behind the finger. If so, it is definitely "touch" and not "press."

Not being a guitar or similar player, I'm not aware of this subtlety. I would think we are dealing with the physics of the sonometer, which deals with strings characterized solely by tension, mass per unit length, and length. See attached. 'Touching' a string does not seem to fit in with this theory, and would not seem to be the subject of an introductory physics course in any case.
 

Attachments

  • sonometer.pdf
    166.3 KB · Views: 309
  • #25
somecelxis said:
if the question ask for 2nd resonance of string (first overtone) . isn't that euqla to 528hz?
... depends: 1st overtone of what?

somecelxis said:
by saying that The waves reflect off your finger instead of reflecting off the far end of the string.

... do you mean the frequency of sound played is only affected by the length of string from the finger plucked to the right node? this is not affected by the length of left node to the hand plucked?
That's correct - and the key to doing this problem.

There are fancy fingering things you can do, but they won't form part of your course.
 
  • #26
Simon Bridge said:
... depends: 1st overtone of what?

That's correct - and the key to doing this problem.

There are fancy fingering things you can do, but they won't form part of your course.

isnt it the first overtone of string = 528hz? (second resonance of string)
 
  • #27
Simon Bridge said:
... depends: 1st overtone of what?

That's correct - and the key to doing this problem.

There are fancy fingering things you can do, but they won't form part of your course.

the frequncy of sound produced must have at least 1 antinode on one end and 1 node and the another end? which is similar to closed pipe. or the sound produced can be also due to 2 antinodes at both ends? ( just like the open pipe) ... sorry for my poor english. hopefully you can understand.
 
  • #28
isnt it the first overtone of string = 528hz? (second resonance of string)
You can answer this yourself - what is the relationship between the frequency of the nth overtone and the fundamental frequency? You should have an equation in your notes.

the frequncy of sound produced must have at least 1 antinode on one end and 1 node and the another end?
You should be able to answer this question yourself.
A "node" is a place where the string does not move. An "antinode" is a place where movement is a maximum.
A guitar string is fixed at both ends - so: can a fixed end move?

Please understand: I am not in the habit of doing people's homework for them.
You have enough information to complete your homework by yourself now.

Just to be sure, here's the basics:
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/waves/string.html
 
  • #29
rude man said:
Not being a guitar or similar player, I'm not aware of this subtlety. I would think we are dealing with the physics of the sonometer, which deals with strings characterized solely by tension, mass per unit length, and length...'Touching' a string does not seem to fit in with this theory, and would not seem to be the subject of an introductory physics course in any case.
Simon Bridge said:
There are fancy fingering things you can do, but they won't form part of your course.
Now that I think about it, the formation of "harmonic" notes may have been discussed when I took high school physics. It can make a great audio-visual demonstration that the vibrating string contains a mixture of modes; by "choosing" nodes at certain parts of the string you essentially select "compatible" sets of modes and therefore the overtone series which is heard.
 
  • #30
Simon Bridge said:
You can answer this yourself - what is the relationship between the frequency of the nth overtone and the fundamental frequency? You should have an equation in your notes.

You should be able to answer this question yourself.
A "node" is a place where the string does not move. An "antinode" is a place where movement is a maximum.
A guitar string is fixed at both ends - so: can a fixed end move?

Please understand: I am not in the habit of doing people's homework for them.
You have enough information to complete your homework by yourself now.

Just to be sure, here's the basics:
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/waves/string.html
A string is fixed at both ends , no sound is produced. The sound can be only produced if at least 1 part of sting contain antinode...
 
  • #31
olivermsun said:
Now that I think about it, the formation of "harmonic" notes may have been discussed when I took high school physics. It can make a great audio-visual demonstration that the vibrating string contains a mixture of modes; by "choosing" nodes at certain parts of the string you essentially select "compatible" sets of modes and therefore the overtone series which is heard.

Whatever fancy fingerwork you may or may not have done in your high school physics class has no bearing on this problem.
 
  • #32
rude man said:
Please read the last sentence in Simon's post # 25. Whatever you may or may not have done in your high school physics class has no bearing on this problem.

Simon's last sentence reads: "There are fancy fingering things you can do, but they won't form part of your course."

Your assertion, meanwhile, was, "'Touching' a string does not seem to fit in with this theory, and would not seem to be the subject of an introductory physics course in any case."

I gave a counter-example in which "touching" a string was part of an introductory physics course, as a reply to an unfounded assertion made on both your parts.
 

What is the difference between fundamental note and fundamental frequency of a string?

The fundamental note of a string is the musical pitch produced by the string when it vibrates at its lowest frequency. On the other hand, the fundamental frequency of a string is the physical property that determines the pitch of the fundamental note. It is the number of complete cycles of vibration that the string makes per second, measured in hertz (Hz).

How are the fundamental note and fundamental frequency of a string related?

The fundamental frequency of a string directly corresponds to the fundamental note it produces. This means that the higher the fundamental frequency, the higher the pitch of the fundamental note. Similarly, a lower fundamental frequency results in a lower pitch fundamental note.

Can the fundamental frequency of a string be changed?

Yes, the fundamental frequency of a string can be changed by altering its tension, length, or mass. For example, tightening a guitar string increases its tension and therefore increases its fundamental frequency, resulting in a higher pitch. Similarly, changing the length of a string or adding weight to it can also alter its fundamental frequency.

What is the significance of the fundamental frequency of a string?

The fundamental frequency of a string is important in determining the pitch of a musical note produced by the string. It also plays a crucial role in creating overtones and harmonics, which contribute to the overall sound quality of an instrument.

How can the fundamental frequency of a string be measured?

The fundamental frequency of a string can be measured using a device called a frequency meter or a tuner. These devices detect the vibrations of the string and display the corresponding frequency in hertz. Alternatively, the fundamental frequency can also be calculated using the string's physical properties, such as its length, tension, and mass, and the mathematical formula for frequency.

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
895
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
868
Replies
6
Views
838
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
3K
Back
Top