Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and Line Integrals: Does it Apply?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the application of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus (FTC) to line integrals, particularly in the context of scalar fields and linear mass densities. It establishes that while the FTC applies to single-variable functions, it does not directly apply to scalar fields as they lack true antiderivatives. However, when considering a linear mass density along a curve, the line integral does equate to the difference of antiderivatives at the endpoints, as the scalar field is intrinsically linked to the curve. The conversation emphasizes the distinction between the FTC and the Fundamental Theorem of Line Integrals, which pertains to vector fields.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus (FTC)
  • Knowledge of scalar fields and their properties
  • Familiarity with line integrals and their applications
  • Concept of mass density in relation to integrals
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Fundamental Theorem of Line Integrals and its implications for vector fields
  • Explore the concept of parametrization in line integrals
  • Research surface integrals and their relation to mass density
  • Learn about partial derivatives and their role in multivariable calculus
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physics students, and anyone studying calculus, particularly those interested in the applications of integrals in physics and engineering contexts.

LucasGB
Messages
181
Reaction score
0
If I draw a random curve over a scalar field, then it is not generally true that the line integral of the scalar field over the curve equals the difference between the value of the antiderivatives of the scalar field at the beginning and finishing points of the curve, as one can clearly see by changing the shape of the curve and keeping the aforementioned points unchanged.

If, on the other hand, the scalar field is a linear mass density and the curve is a piece of wire, then it is true that the line integral of the scalar field over the curve equals the difference between the value of the antiderivatives of the scalar field at the beginning and finishing points of the curve, because now the scalar field is closely related to the curve, and if I change the shape of the curve, I'll change the scalar field in the same manner. (Remember that the antiderivative of a linear mass density is mass)

So, should I say the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus applies or doesn't apply to line integrals?

PS.: Note I'm not talking about the Fundamental Theorem of Line Integrals, which is all about the line integrals of vector fields.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A scalar field has no "anti-derivative" as it is a function of several variables, just like it doesn't have a derivative, but only a partial derivative.

Fundamental Theorem of Calculus is only about one variable functions f(x).
In integration of a curve, you choosed a parametrization and then your integrand reduces to a single-variable function g(t), and then the fundamental theorem applies.

So you should really say that the fundamental theorem of calculus is not really relevant to your question.
 
elibj123 said:
A scalar field has no "anti-derivative" as it is a function of several variables, just like it doesn't have a derivative, but only a partial derivative.

Fundamental Theorem of Calculus is only about one variable functions f(x).
In integration of a curve, you choosed a parametrization and then your integrand reduces to a single-variable function g(t), and then the fundamental theorem applies.

So you should really say that the fundamental theorem of calculus is not really relevant to your question.

Allright, that's interesting, but I still have doubts.

1. Let's say I want to do a surface integral to find the mass of a surface. So I simply integrate p (area density) with respect to dA over the entire surface. I can say p is a scalar field, since it is a value attributed to all points of the surface. Can't I say mass is the antiderivative of p, since p=dm/dA?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K