Can Alternative Technologies Overcome the Cost of Fuel in Vehicle Progression?

In summary, people think the developments and future of Waste Exhaust Heat Recovery are intriguing and there is potential for it to have a large impact on the automotive industry. However, the efficiency of the technology is low, and there are few cars that use this technology currently.
  • #1
19,445
10,024
What do people think of the developments and future of Waste Exhaust Heat Recovery? Thermoelectric Conversion of exhaust heat into electric power to drive auxiliaries.

Thermodynamic Conversion of waste exhaust ( + radiator + Charge air cooler + EGR cooler) heat into additional crankshaft power: Hybrids + Regenerative Energy Recovery ( Batteries , Hydraulic , etc ) , Renewable Energy + Biofuels.

This is a paraphrased question for my girlfriends father :smile:
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
I'm a firm beliver in the use of heat-pipes, thermionic converters, etc. to extract every possible bit of energy from the combustion process. I guess that the trade-off would be when the weight of the equipment would offset the amount of energy it can provide (assuming no purchase cost issues).
 
  • #3
I think we are waiting for a material that can keep the heat of the combustion in and not melt, along with other properties needed for a ice.
 
  • #4
Those ideas sound neat, but they have extremely poor efficiency. Thermoelectric is something like 5% for generating electricity. I'm a fan of waste heat recovery, but by far the best way to do it (if the goal is mechanical or electrical energy) is via some conventional combined-cycle or boosted thermodynamic cycle. Ie, you use an aft-end boiler to run a steam turbine or you use the exhaust itself to spin a turbocharger.
 
  • #5
I didn't mean to imply that thermionic converstion would be a major stage. I'm thinking more of just something to line the ass end of the exhaust pipe with after there isn't enough heat left to power a mechanical conversion. It might serve to provide onboard clock or radio functions.
 
  • #6
Are they're any cars/vehicles that use this waste recovery technology? Anything in development?
 
  • #7
I know that a few German automotive OEMs are looking at using exhaust heat exchangers to drive a turbine for supercharging, but nothing electrical. The juice isn't worth the squeeze.
 
  • #8
i just posted a new topic kind of in this genre. the title is "turbo alternator" but to add to this convo, I know that bmw has a steam turbine supplement in development, it uses waste heat to turn a turbine that turns the alternator thus removing the parasitic loss off the engine. if you feel like it, check out my idea, posted in the mech engineering section.
 
  • #9
Greg Bernhardt said:
What do people think of the developments and future of Waste Exhaust Heat Recovery? Thermoelectric Conversion of exhaust heat into electric power to drive auxiliaries.

Thermodynamic Conversion of waste exhaust ( + radiator + Charge air cooler + EGR cooler) heat into additional crankshaft power: Hybrids + Regenerative Energy Recovery ( Batteries , Hydraulic , etc ) , Renewable Energy + Biofuels.

This is a paraphrased question for my girlfriends father :smile:

I think the secret to future engines is to go beyond the fact that heat is required in the first place. Once you overcome that barrier, you will no longer be constrained by the laws of thermodynamics.
 
  • #10
Year-old thread, but...
OmCheeto said:
I think the secret to future engines is to go beyond the fact that heat is required in the first place. Once you overcome that barrier, you will no longer be constrained by the laws of thermodynamics.
Sorry, but the laws of thermodynamics are more general than that. They cover every situation where there is energy transfter, so anything that ever powers a car will have to adhere to them.
 
  • #11
russ_watters said:
Year-old thread, but... Sorry, but the laws of thermodynamics are more general than that. They cover every situation where there is energy transfter, so anything that ever powers a car will have to adhere to them.

Interesting. I'll have to check that out. I've never thought about a marble rolling down an incline and the laws of thermodynamics in the same way. Might be old preconceptions.

BTW, I was researching something yesterday and ran across this thread. I thought it was an interesting topic that I thought would have been fun to discuss. But alas, in the myriad of posts, I missed it. Today someone told me it was Greg's birthday. I thought it would be fun to do a necropost for the occasion.
 
  • #12
OmCheeto said:
Interesting. I'll have to check that out. I've never thought about a marble rolling down an incline and the laws of thermodynamics in the same way. Might be old preconceptions.
Yep - you're converting gravitational potential energy (PE) to kinetic energy (KE) and you're losing it to friction (FE) and air resistance (AE). So your conservation of energy (first law of thermodynamics) statement is:

PE - FE - AE = KE

And your efficiency statement is:

KE/PE * 100 = Eff (< 100%)
 
  • #13
research turbo compound. its a miracle no large company has brought this wwii technology back into modern context. its basically a huge exducer that is connected to the crankshaft. if my research is correct and not false some test planes have shown an increase in torque production in the order of 30% with obviously 0% increase in fuel consumption. should result in a 25% decrease in BSFC. what do you guys think?
 
  • #14
Smokey Yunick..my idle and know genius in racing.. did some work on the extended tip spark plug, reverse flow cooling systems, a high efficiency vapor carburetor, a high-efficiency adiabatic engine, Hot Vapor Cylce Engine and various engine testing devices. Check out HVC engine and adiabatgic engine

He took air fuel mixture and heated to 190° F by the coolant, then it goes through the turbo/atomiser, which heats it to 280° F then is heated further by the exhaust to 450° F

Then it is compressed in the cylinder to 1500° F, at which point the spark fires.

Then it goes through the exhaust valve, heats the incoming mixture, and then into the expansion side of the turbo. He got a Plymouth Horizon 4 cyl to go over 50 mpg
 
  • #15
Ranger Mike said:
He took air fuel mixture and heated to 190° F by the coolant, then it goes through the turbo/atomiser, which heats it to 280° F then is heated further by the exhaust to 450° F

Then it is compressed in the cylinder to 1500° F, at which point the spark fires.

Then it goes through the exhaust valve, heats the incoming mixture, and then into the expansion side of the turbo. He got a Plymouth Horizon 4 cyl to go over 50 mpg

generally at 536 degrees F gasoline auto ignites. before the air fuel mixture could even come close that 1500F it would auto ignite. and if i understand correctly the auto ignition temp could be artificially raised by lowering oxygen concentration mainly by diluting the mixture with water injection or exhaust gases of high amounts but then there would be considerably less air fuel mixture to burn per expansion phase hence severely reduced power production. it might work but then it wouldn't make any power, at least not nearly enough to keep the consumers of today happy.
it shouldn't be any different than just using a 1 litre regular piston. that'll get you 50mpg too with similar power production. as long as it doesn't have to be fast getting 80mpg is a piece of cake.
 
  • #16
you are correct reagrding the statements about normal gasoline and normal exposure to hi temps..but Smokey solved all of these through hard work and much innovation..in fact the Detroit gang flew in several times to see his hi temp engine working..
i suggest anyone interested ..research this...i got no dog in this fight..just tellin you what has been done...
 
  • #17
I believe the future of energy production on a utility scale will be fusion. I base this on the fact that it has relatively no waste. (I know the question was on waste heat but I wanted to add this post). Check out the iter. www.iter.org
 
  • #18
Being a turbo guy, I believ the direct future is combined cycle or co-generation. the first can reach cycle efficiencies up to 65% and the later around 80%. This will also be a way to burn gasified coal and reduce NOx, CO, Soot and mercury emissions. The main problem today is to have a single engine capable of operating on several different fuels (liquid, gas, high hydrogen, etc).

For car engines, I expect more hybrids and eventually electric cars depending on the battery technology. With the fuel prices being low again the incentive for these technologies has diminished significantly, regretfully.
 
  • #19
jaap de vries, the cost of fuel plays such an impact on alternative technology progression. It is a shame.
 

Related to Can Alternative Technologies Overcome the Cost of Fuel in Vehicle Progression?

1. What are the most promising future engine technologies?

Some of the most promising future engine technologies include electric engines, hydrogen fuel cell engines, and hybrid engines that combine electric and traditional combustion engines.

2. Will future engines be more environmentally friendly?

Yes, there is a growing focus on developing engines that are more environmentally friendly and emit lower levels of pollutants. This includes reducing carbon emissions and finding alternative fuel sources.

3. How will future engines impact the automotive industry?

Future engines have the potential to greatly impact the automotive industry by changing the types of vehicles that are produced and how they are powered. This could also lead to changes in manufacturing processes and supply chains.

4. What challenges do scientists face in developing future engines?

Some challenges in developing future engines include finding sustainable and cost-effective fuel sources, improving engine efficiency, and meeting regulatory standards for emissions and safety.

5. Will future engines be able to power flying vehicles?

There is ongoing research and development into engines that could potentially power flying vehicles, such as electric or hybrid engines. However, there are still technical and regulatory challenges that need to be addressed before this becomes a reality.

Similar threads

  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • Thermodynamics
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
30K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Back
Top