Confusing Mechanics Question: Velocity of Rocket on Touchdown

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the confusion surrounding the use of gravitational acceleration values in mechanics problems, specifically regarding the velocity of a rocket upon touchdown. Participants clarify that the choice between using g = -9.8 m/s² or g = 9.8 m/s² depends on the defined direction of "up." Consistency in sign convention is crucial for accurate calculations. The inconsistency in a textbook problem, where parts a and b used -9.8 m/s² while part c used 9.8 m/s², illustrates the importance of recognizing and adhering to a chosen convention throughout problem-solving.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with gravitational acceleration concepts
  • Knowledge of sign conventions in physics
  • Ability to interpret and solve physics problems
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of different sign conventions in physics problems
  • Study the concept of gravitational acceleration in various contexts
  • Learn how to derive velocity from height in free-fall scenarios
  • Examine common mistakes in physics problem-solving and how to avoid them
USEFUL FOR

Students studying mechanics, educators teaching physics concepts, and anyone looking to enhance their problem-solving skills in physics.

Falley
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
So,while learning mechanics,I found that most questions use g=-9.8 ,but when calculating the velocity the instant a rocket touches the ground,the solution instead used g=9.8,which is very confusing.Other questions of similar workings used g=-9.8,anybody care to help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It depends on which direction you define as "up". As long as you are consistent, it doesn't matter which you use.
 
But for the same question,part a),b)c) a n b used -9.8 while c used 9.8
 
In every problem we get to choose whether we consider forces, velocities, and accelerations to be positive when they're in the upwards direction and negative when they're in the downward direction, or the other way around. Gravity pulls downward, so it will be negative if you use the "positive up" convention, positive if you use the "positive down" convention.

Either way works just fine - you just have to be consistent throughout the problem.
 
Falley said:
But for the same question,part a),b)c) a n b used -9.8 while c used 9.8

Most likely your textbook author was most comfortable thinking about parts a and b one way and part c the other way. Once you get used to it, you'll find yourself picking whichever one feels most natural for a given problem or subproblem without even thinking about it.

Or maybe he did it in purpose, just to keep you on your toes... Recognizing which sign convention is being used and being able to handle either one is an important skill and exercising it might have been the point of this problem.

Or maybe he was just careless. It happens :smile:
 
Post the exact question otherwise we are guessing.
 
Example 3,the rocket
 

Attachments

Both are meaningless without units... :)
 
Falley said:
Example 3,the rocket
That is just a typo. The equation, as written, doesn't have the solution 25.9 s. The solutions for +9.8 m/s^2 are both negative. Only -9.8 m/s^2 gives a positive solution and that soluiton is 25.9 s.
 
  • #10
In case it's not obvious... Their approach is far more complicated than necessary. They are working out the impact velocity starting from the point where the rocket motor shuts off on the way up. It's possible to do that but it's much easier to assume it just falls from the max height which you worked out in part (b).
 
  • #11
Thanks a lot,cleared up a lot of things for me
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
801
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K