1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Galilean beam expander and spherical aberration

  1. Dec 2, 2008 #1
    Sorry for posting this post in two different place, I could not decide where is the best place to post it.

    I am trying to build a Galilean beam expander/contraction using a plano-convex and plano-convace lenses. My question is how should I arrange them to reduce the spherical aberration?
    Should the two plano surfaces face each other (http://www.mellesgriot.com/glossary/imagesDir/Gallilean.gif" [Broken]), the two curvatures surfaces facing one another, or some different way.

    I need to know that both for a beam expander and beam contraction.

    Thank you
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 3, 2017
  2. jcsd
  3. Dec 2, 2008 #2

    mgb_phys

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    General rule is 'split the powers' = minimise the amount of curvature at each face.
    That is the curved face should face the colimated beam and the flat face - the diverging/converging beam.
     
  4. Dec 2, 2008 #3
    Thank you for your answer.

    What is confusing me is that according to this document from Melles Griot
    http://www.mellesgriot.com/pdf/CatalogX/X_01_27-28.pdf" [Broken]
    they should be aligned in a different way ( see figure 1.32 )

    So what way reduces the spherical aberration better?

    Thanks
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 3, 2017
  5. Dec 2, 2008 #4

    mgb_phys

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    I think their catalogue is just showing a diagram, this one has more detail
    http://www.edmundoptics.com/TechSupport/DisplayArticle.cfm?articleid=270 [Broken]
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 3, 2017
  6. Dec 3, 2008 #5
    I do not think it is only a diagram, they are driving an example.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 3, 2017
  7. Dec 13, 2008 #6

    Redbelly98

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    Surpisingly, they are showing it wrong for the negative lens. Note in Fig. 1.31, that arrangement has worse aberration than the other way around (1.069 vs. 0.272)

    mgb_phy's link to Edmund has the correct figure at the top of the web page.

    The way I remember it is: never have the flat face facing a collimated beam.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 3, 2017
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Galilean beam expander and spherical aberration
  1. Spherical aberration (Replies: 2)

Loading...