Galileo and Newton: Close is Good Enough for Discoveries

  • Thread starter Thread starter KL7AJ
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Galileo
AI Thread Summary
Galileo's discovery that a pendulum's period is independent of its swing amplitude is significant, though it only holds true for small swings. This observation highlights the importance of approximations in scientific understanding, as seen with Newton's laws, which, despite being incomplete, remain effective for most daily applications. The discussion emphasizes that close approximations can lead to major breakthroughs, suggesting that future fundamental discoveries may lie in unexpected areas. The conversation also warns against overanalyzing minor details at the expense of larger insights. The thread was ultimately locked due to its philosophical nature.
KL7AJ
Messages
78
Reaction score
12
One of the many earth-shattering discoveries Galileo made (after lots of rumination, I've concluded he's a tie with Newton as my favorite all time smart guy)...was the fact that a pendulum's period is independent of its excursion.

Actually, this is true only for small levels of swing, as what Galileo observed with the swinging chandelier in the cathedral. Upon further extrapolation, we find that there are a lot of higher order terms that make this a rather non linear function.

But this demonstrates a principle a lot of us forget. Sometimes CLOSE is more than good enough to make some tremendous discoveries. Likewise, Newton's laws, while recently proven to be incomplete, are still 99% good enough for nearly everything we observe in daily life. They represented a quantum leap in understanding, with only minor refinements in the "modern" era.

We need to be careful to avoid "straining at a gnat and swallowing a camel," to wax Biblical. I think there are still some fundamental discoveries to be made that are just as profound as Newton's laws. But they may not be where we're currently looking.

Eric
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since this is more philosophy than physics, thread locked.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top