Galloway: punished for defending himself?

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Schrodinger's Dog
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

George Galloway is facing an 18-day suspension from the House of Commons due to allegations of concealing the source of Iraqi funding related to his Mariam Appeal charity. The Parliamentary standards committee concluded that Galloway "damaged the reputation of the House" through his comments during the inquiry. Galloway has denied any wrongdoing and claims the investigation was politicized, arguing that he is being punished for his vigorous defense rather than any actual misconduct. This situation highlights concerns regarding the integrity of parliamentary inquiries and the treatment of dissenting voices.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of UK parliamentary procedures and standards
  • Familiarity with the Mariam Appeal charity and its context
  • Knowledge of the political climate surrounding the Iraq war
  • Awareness of the implications of political funding and accountability
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the role of the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards in the UK
  • Examine the history and impact of the Mariam Appeal charity
  • Investigate the political ramifications of the Iraq war on UK politics
  • Explore case studies of political suspensions and their outcomes in the UK Parliament
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for political analysts, journalists covering UK politics, and individuals interested in the dynamics of parliamentary accountability and political dissent.

Schrodinger's Dog
Messages
835
Reaction score
7
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/6901033.stm

Galloway faces Commons suspension
George Galloway
Mr Galloway has strongly denied receiving money from the Iraqi regime
Respect MP George Galloway is facing suspension from the House of Commons for 18 days, following an investigation by Parliament's standards committee.

The MPs say he "damaged the reputation of the House" in his comments about the inquiry into his Mariam Appeal charity.

The suspension was the result of him "concealing the true source of Iraqi funding" and "calling into question" the integrity of standards watchdogs.

Mr Galloway said he was being punished for the "robust way I defended myself".

He has always denied receiving money from Saddam Hussein's regime.

The MP for Bethnal Green and Bow, who was expelled from the Labour Party in 2003 following outspoken comments about the Iraq war, has said the probe by the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards and the Committee on Standards and Privileges was "politicised".

I just watched the press conference with Mr Galloway and I have to say I kind of see why he's a bit miffed, he faced allegations of "concealing the true source of Iraqi funding" - he himself being vehemently anti government on it's foreign policy - A charge that proved totally false as he had never even asked about the sources. So instead of the committee apologising for the false accusations, and for falsely trying to slander and liable his reputation. They have chosen to suspend him, not because of the reasons for the enquiry, but because of his defence of himself, which they labelled as robust?

Now I am quite set against this government, I think they have deeply divided a nation over a war that was founded on lies and deceptive political games. So with that in mind I may be biased, but this seems to be somewhat of an abuse of power to me, those in power have failed to substantiate their allegations, and instead of retracting them are blaming the person who was found innocent, "of bringing them into disrepute"?

I can assure them they are already in disrepute, I'm not sure how much further they can go :smile:

Some irony here :smile:

Anyway What do you think of this affair?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It will be interesting to see if the House votes to support the recommendation though although it might give rise to a lively debate I suspect it will.

It appears he is being punished not for any wrongdoing but for upsetting the sensibilities of the committee members investigating him.

In his interview he made a couple of very valid points
He said there was "grotesque irony" that Parliament had refused to hold a full inquiry into the Iraq war, but had spent four years "inquiring into one of the leaders of the anti-war movement"
and
He also said, referring to cash-for-honours claims and the recent attendance of a convicted rapist at a party fundraising event, that "the people in the building behind me are the last people on Earth to criticise" anyone over funding for political campaigns
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hes a clever politician, no doubt he will bounce back.. Seems to be a trend in this Clever politician coming from Scottish backgrounds :smile:

He reminds me a lot of Tony Ben actually, another politician I had time for.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
11K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 79 ·
3
Replies
79
Views
12K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K