MHB Galois Theory - Fixed Field of F and Definition of Aut(K/F) ....

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Dummit and Foote, Chapter 14 - Galois Theory.

I am currently studying Section 14.2 : The Fundamental Theorem of Galois Theory ... ...

I need some help with Corollary 10 of Section 14.2 ... ... and the definition of $$\text{Aut}(K/F)$$ ... ...

Corollary 10 reads as follows:
View attachment 6666
Now the Definition of $$\text{Aut}(K/F)$$ is as follows:
https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/6667
Now in Corollary 10 we read the following:

" ... ... Then

$$| \text{Aut}(K/F) | \ \le \ [ K \ : \ F ] $$with equality if and only if F is the fixed field of $$\text{Aut}(K/F)$$ ... ... "
My question is as follows:

Given the definition of $$\text{Aut}(K/F)$$ shown above, isn't $$F$$ guaranteed to be the fixed field of $$\text{Aut}(K/F)$$ ... ... ?
Hope someone can resolve this problem/issue ...

Help will be much appreciated ...

Peter===========================================================================================
The above post will be easier to follow if readers understand D&F's definition of a Galois Extension and a Galois Group ... so I am providing the definition as follows ... ... :

https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/6668
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Peter,

Let $L$ be a field, and let $H$ be a subgroup of the automorphism group $\operatorname{Aut}{L}$. The fixed field of $H$, usually denoted $L^H$, is defined as the set of all $x\in L$ such that $\sigma x = x$ for all $\sigma \in H$, i.e., the set of all elements of $L$ that are left fixed by $H$.

In your situation, $L = K$ and $H = \operatorname{Aut}(K/F)$. By definition of $H$, $H$ fixes all elements of $F$, so $K^H \supset F$. The definition does not say that the only elements fixed by $H$ are the elements of $F$. As an example, consider the extension field $\Bbb Q(\sqrt[3]{2})/\Bbb Q$. The only automorphism of $\Bbb Q(\sqrt[3]{2})$ is the identity, so the fixed field of $\operatorname{Aut}(\Bbb Q(\sqrt[3]{2})/\Bbb Q$ is $\Bbb Q(\sqrt[3]{2})$, which is different from $\Bbb Q$. In particular, $\Bbb Q(\sqrt[3]{2})$ is not a Galois extension of $\Bbb Q$.
 
Euge said:
Hi Peter,

Let $L$ be a field, and let $H$ be a subgroup of the automorphism group $\operatorname{Aut}{L}$. The fixed field of $H$, usually denoted $L^H$, is defined as the set of all $x\in L$ such that $\sigma x = x$ for all $\sigma \in H$, i.e., the set of all elements of $L$ that are left fixed by $H$.

In your situation, $L = K$ and $H = \operatorname{Aut}(K/F)$. By definition of $H$, $H$ fixes all elements of $F$, so $K^H \supset F$. The definition does not say that the only elements fixed by $H$ are the elements of $F$. As an example, consider the extension field $\Bbb Q(\sqrt[3]{2})/\Bbb Q$. The only automorphism of $\Bbb Q(\sqrt[3]{2})$ is the identity, so the fixed field of $\operatorname{Aut}(\Bbb Q(\sqrt[3]{2})/\Bbb Q$ is $\Bbb Q(\sqrt[3]{2})$, which is different from $\Bbb Q$. In particular, $\Bbb Q(\sqrt[3]{2})$ is not a Galois extension of $\Bbb Q$.
Thanks Euge ... that helped in a big way ...

Most grateful for your help and support ...Peter
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top