Gamma Function Complex Argument: Problems in Stat Phys & How to Calculate

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the calculation of the gamma function for complex arguments, specifically \Gamma(i). A correction was made to the integral definition of the gamma function, clarifying that it should be \Gamma(z)=\int^{\infty}_0x^{z-1}e^{-x}dx. It was noted that the integral converges only for \Re z > 0, necessitating the use of analytic continuation for complex values like z=i. The functional equation \Gamma(z+1) = z\Gamma(z) is suggested for calculating \Gamma(i), leading to an approximate value of \Gamma(i) as -.1549498283-.4980156681i. Understanding these calculations is essential for addressing problems in statistical physics that involve gamma functions of complex arguments.
Petar Mali
Messages
283
Reaction score
0
\Gamma(z)=\int^{\infty}_0x^{z-1}e^{-x}dz
z\in\mathhad{C}

In which problems in statistical physics we need gamma functions of complex argument?

I don't know how to calculate \Gamma(i) for exaple?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Petar Mali said:
\Gamma(z)=\int^{\infty}_0x^{z-1}e^{-z}dz
z\in\mathhad{C}

In which problems in statistical physics we need gamma functions of complex argument?

I don't know how to calculate \Gamma(i) for exaple?
Your formula is wrong (typo) Should be

\Gamma(z)=\int^{\infty}_0x^{z-1}e^{-x}dx
 
mathman said:
Your formula is wrong (typo) Should be

\Gamma(z)=\int^{\infty}_0x^{z-1}e^{-x}dx

Yes mistake. I make corrcection!
 
Petar Mali said:
Yes mistake. I make corrcection!

Not quite: you still have dz when it should be dx.
 
\Gamma(i)

Well, the integral definition converges only if \Re z > 0, so in particular it does not converge at z=i. So you need to use analytic continuation. But fortunately that is very easy for the \Gamma function, unlike most other functions. Use the functional equation \Gamma(z+1) = z\Gamma(z). So to compute \Gamma(i) we can compute \Gamma(1+i) then apply the formula.

You cannot expect a closed-form answer. \Gamma(1+i) \approx .4980156681-.1549498283i so divide by i to get \Gamma(i) \approx -.1549498283-.4980156681i.
 
I was reading documentation about the soundness and completeness of logic formal systems. Consider the following $$\vdash_S \phi$$ where ##S## is the proof-system making part the formal system and ##\phi## is a wff (well formed formula) of the formal language. Note the blank on left of the turnstile symbol ##\vdash_S##, as far as I can tell it actually represents the empty set. So what does it mean ? I guess it actually means ##\phi## is a theorem of the formal system, i.e. there is a...
Back
Top