Why Don't Gases Make a Boom When They Exceed the Speed of Sound?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ssor1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gases
ssor1
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello

My first posting and doubtless it betrays my ignorance :smile:

Doing the basic maths for an ideal gas, I find that the speed of a molecule exceeds the speed of sound through the same gas. I know jets make a terrific 'boom' when they break the sound barrier. Why don't gases go boom? Or have I got the maths wrong? I like to think Nature very kindly chooses to break her own laws rather than let trifling molecules break the sound barrier, which would offend the ears of us more significant particles. Am I right or am I wrong? Any advice would be most welcome :approve:

ssor1
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Hello ssor1,

Welcome to the forum and thank you for sharing your thoughts and questions! It's great to see that you're curious and willing to learn more about the behavior of gases.

To answer your question, gases do not produce a "boom" sound when they exceed the speed of sound because they are made up of individual molecules that are very small and spread out. When a jet breaks the sound barrier, it is a large object moving at a high speed and creates a shock wave that produces a loud noise.

On the other hand, gas molecules are so small and spread out that when they exceed the speed of sound, they do not create a shock wave or produce a loud noise. In fact, the molecules are constantly colliding with each other and bouncing off in different directions, so the overall effect is not a loud boom but rather a continuous and random movement.

In short, the scale and behavior of gas molecules are very different from that of a jet breaking the sound barrier, which is why we do not hear a "boom" when gases exceed the speed of sound. I hope this helps to clarify your question. Keep asking and learning, and don't worry about making mistakes - that's how we all learn and grow!
 
This is an alert about a claim regarding the standard model, that got a burst of attention in the past two weeks. The original paper came out last year: "The electroweak η_W meson" by Gia Dvali, Archil Kobakhidze, Otari Sakhelashvili (2024) The recent follow-up and other responses are "η_W-meson from topological properties of the electroweak vacuum" by Dvali et al "Hiding in Plain Sight, the electroweak η_W" by Giacomo Cacciapaglia, Francesco Sannino, Jessica Turner "Astrophysical...
Hello everyone, I am seeking to better understand the conceptual foundations and potential consequences of "Two-Time Physics" (2T-physics), as developed by Itzhak Bars and others. My interest was sparked by a recent paper that attempts to explain anomalous results in particle physics (apparent superluminal propagation of virtual photons) within the framework of 2T-physics: Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.02696 Key quote from the abstract: *"...the problem... can be solved naturally...

Similar threads

Back
Top