Gauge invariance of Euler-Lagrange equations

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the gauge invariance of the Euler-Lagrange equations as presented in the textbook “Lagrangian and Hamiltonian Mechanics” by MC Calkin. The key assertion is that the Euler-Lagrange equation remains unchanged when a total time derivative of a real scalar field is added to the Lagrangian. The participant seeks a formal proof of this assertion, which is crucial for understanding the implications of gauge transformations in the context of charged particles in electromagnetic fields.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lagrangian mechanics
  • Familiarity with Euler-Lagrange equations
  • Knowledge of gauge transformations in physics
  • Basic concepts of electromagnetic fields
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the proof of gauge invariance in the context of Lagrangian mechanics
  • Study the implications of total time derivatives on the Lagrangian
  • Explore advanced topics in electromagnetic theory related to charged particles
  • Examine additional resources on the derivation of equations of motion from the Euler-Lagrange equation
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those focusing on classical mechanics, theoretical physicists, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of gauge invariance in Lagrangian systems.

andrewkirk
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
Messages
4,140
Reaction score
1,741
I have been trying to teach myself Lagrangian mechanics from a textbook “Lagrangian and Hamiltonian Mechanics” by MC Calkin. It has covered virtual displacements, generalised coordinates, d’Alembert’s principle, the definition of the Lagrangian, the Euler-Lagrange differential equation and how it can be used to derive equations of motion for a system.

In discussing the motion of a charged particle in electromagnetic fields, the book introduces the concept of gauge transformations and how they make no change to the derived equations of motion. I can follow the logic of that, but it also claims that it is “easy to show” that the Euler-Lagrange equation \frac{d}{dt}(\frac{\partial L}{\partial\.q_a}) = \frac{\partial L}{\partial q_a} is unchanged by the addition to the Lagrangian L of a term that is a total time derivative of a real scalar field <br /> \lambda(t,x,y,z) defined in the space-time under consideration. I can't see why this should be the case, and I have been unable to turn up a proof through internet searching, although I have found another site that suggests it is true.

Can anyone point me to a place that proves this result?

Thanks very much for any help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K