Gauss Divergence theorem to find flux through sphere with cavity.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on applying the Gauss Divergence Theorem to calculate the outward flux of the vector field F = √(x² + y² + z²)(xî + yĵ + zk) across the boundary of a spherical region defined by 1 ≤ x² + y² + z² ≤ 4. The correct approach involves treating the outer sphere of radius 2 and the inner cavity of radius 1 separately, ensuring the outward normal is maintained. The final calculated flux is confirmed as ∫_S F · dA = 48π, validating the use of the divergence theorem with the appropriate normal direction.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Gauss Divergence Theorem
  • Familiarity with vector calculus and surface integrals
  • Knowledge of spherical coordinates for volume integration
  • Proficiency in calculating dot products of vector fields
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the Gauss Divergence Theorem in various geometries
  • Learn about spherical coordinates and their integration techniques
  • Explore advanced vector calculus concepts, including curl and gradient
  • Practice problems involving flux calculations in different vector fields
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, physics, and engineering who are working on vector calculus, particularly those focusing on flux calculations and the application of the Gauss Divergence Theorem.

jameson2
Messages
42
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Use the divergence theorem to find the outward flux of a vector field <br /> F=\sqrt{x^2+y^2+z^2}(x\hat{i}+y\hat{j}+z\hat{k}) across the boundary of the region 1\leq x^2+y^2+z^2 \leq4<br />


Homework Equations


The Gauss Divergence Theorem states \int_D dV \nabla \bullet F=\int_S F\bullet dA where D is a 3d region and S is it's boundary.


The Attempt at a Solution


First, I sketched out the boundary, which I think is a sphere of radius 2 with a cavity f radius 1 at the centre. The formula requires that S is oriented outwards.
I basically need to know if the way to do this is first to treat it first as a sphere of radius 2 without a cavity, and work out the outward flux through this. Then treat the cavity as a sphere of radius 1 and work out the flux going into this, and add the two.
If this is the right approach, I'm not sure how to treat an inward pointing area element. The formula seems to heavily stress that the outward normal is taken, and I don't know if taking an inward normal is allowed.
Alternatively, I think I might be able to take the region as a whole straightaway, and then when integrating over the volume just take the limits of the radius as 2 and 1.
This way, which is the only way can actually get an answer at the moment, gives me an answer for the flux as\int_S F\bullet dA=48\pi
Any help would be much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"Outward" means "pointing away from the interior of the region". The outward normal on the inner (radius-1) surface points toward the origin, not away from it.

Incidentally, dot product is \cdot, not \bullet: \int_S F \cdot dA
 
Ok, does that mean the way I got my answer isn't valid? Since by doing the whole thing in one go I only treated the normal pointing away from the outer surface and not the interior normal pointing towrads the origin?
 
No; if you computed \int_D (\nabla\cdot F)\,dV, then the divergence theorem says that equals the flux with the normal taken in the correct (away from the region) direction.
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K