Gauss' law and flux concept issues

AI Thread Summary
Flux is defined as proportional to the number of electric field lines passing through a given area. For a 2D circle enclosing a charge, the flux is calculated as 2q/Epsilon, which is correct. However, a 3D sphere with the same diameter also encloses the same charge, resulting in the same flux of 2q/Epsilon. The confusion arises because a sphere, being a closed surface, allows Gauss's law to apply, while a circle does not since it is not closed. Understanding that only closed surfaces can be used with Gauss's law clarifies the concept of flux in this context.
engineeringstudnt
Messages
15
Reaction score
5
Homework Statement
Gauss's law and flux concept issues
Relevant Equations
flux=Qenclosing/Epsilon
Hi guys i have some concept issues about flux. My book says flux is proportional to the number of lines passing through that area. so my question is: first i am thinking that a 2D circle which has a 2r diameter and it is enclosing a 2q charge so its flux should be 2q/Epsilon.then i am thinking a 3D sphere which have a 2r diamater again. so its flux should be 2q/Epsilon too ,right ?

but how ? isn't the sphere has more electric field lines passing through its area ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The Gaussian surface must be a closed surface. A circle in three-dimensional space isn't a closed surface, so Gauss's law won't hold.
 
  • Like
Likes engineeringstudnt
thank you very much i am thinking about this almost 45 minutes :D
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top