Gauss' law electrostatics problem involving charge densities

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving Gauss' law in electrostatics, specifically focusing on a nonconducting spherical shell with a volume charge density that varies with radius. The original poster seeks to determine a specific charge density parameter to achieve a uniform electric field within the shell.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to equate the electric field expressions at different points within the shell to solve for the charge density parameter A. Some participants question the correctness of the charge evaluation within the Gaussian surface, suggesting a need for a volume integral due to the non-uniform charge distribution.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring the implications of the non-uniform charge density and the necessity of reevaluating the Gaussian surface approach. There is acknowledgment of the original poster's method, but also a suggestion for deeper analysis.

Contextual Notes

The problem involves specific constraints regarding the charge density and the geometry of the spherical shell, which may affect the evaluation of the electric field. The original poster's approach has led to discrepancies with expected results, prompting further investigation into the assumptions made.

chipotleaway
Messages
174
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A nonconducting spherical shell has a thickness [itex]b-a[/itex], where b is the outer radius and a the inner radius has a volume charge density [itex]\rho=\frac{A}{r}, r\in[a,b][/itex]. If there is a charge +q located at the center, what must [itex]A[/itex] be in order for the electric field to be uniform in the shell?

The Attempt at a Solution


The electric field for any [itex]r\in[a,b][/itex] must be equal to the field at [itex]a[/itex], whiuch is [itex]E_1=k\frac{q}{a^2}[/itex]. The field at any point in the shell is [itex]E_2=k(\frac{q}{r^2}+\frac{4A\pi}{3r}(r^3-a^3)\frac{1}{r^2})[/itex]. I equated the two expressions and tried to solve for A but the expression I'm getting is not in agreeance with the the solution. Is this approach correct?

Here's a diagram of the problem (right)
http://s3.amazonaws.com/answer-board-image/81404896-a1bf-4193-80c7-9d515c2eb554.jpeg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The approach is correct, but you should reconsider the charge inside your Gaußian surface. It's not uniform, and thus you have to really evaluate the volme integral!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Got it! Thanks :p
 
chipotleaway said:
Got it! Thanks :p

OK, and your answer is ... ?
 
A non-conducting spherical shell carries a non-uniform charge density ρ=ρ0r1/r. Determine the electric field in the regions:
A) 0<r<r1
B)r1<r<r0
C)r>r0

r1 is radius to inside of shell. r0 is radius to outside of shell.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
782
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
5K