Gauss' Law - Infinite Sheet of Charge

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around deriving the electric field intensity vector for an infinite sheet of charge using Gauss' law. Participants explore the implications of planar symmetry and the setup of the problem in free space.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of Gauss' law and the choice of enclosing the sheet within a rectangular cube. Questions arise regarding the interpretation of planar symmetry and the development of the solution. Some participants express confusion about the implications of an infinite sheet and the resulting electric field direction.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights into the flux through the cube's surfaces and questioning the assumptions made in the original poster's approach. There is a mix of interpretations regarding the geometry of the problem and the resulting electric field behavior.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note the challenge of conceptualizing an infinite sheet and the implications for the electric field at large distances. The discussion reflects varying levels of understanding about the application of Gauss' law in this context.

jegues
Messages
1,085
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement



Using Gauss' law, derive the expression for the electric field intensity vector of an infinite sheet of charge in free space.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



See figure attached for their solution and the figure that goes with the problem.

What do they mean by planar symmetry? Is it simply that the whole surface lies in a plane and is symmetric?

Also it's not obvious to me as to how they developped their answer.

Using Gauss's law,

\oint_{S} \vec{E}\cdot\hat{n}dS = \frac{Q_{enclosed}}{\epsilon_{0}}

First we note that the electric field vectors in space due to the sheet are normal to the sheet.

Now if I enclose the sheet in a rectangular cube, the electric field vectors will be pointing parallel to the normal vectors on the top and bottom of the rectangular cube.

Thus,

E\oint_{S}dS = \frac{Q_{enclosed}}{\epsilon_{0}}

The surface area of the rectangular box, \oint_{S}dS should simply be 2(lh) + 2(lw) + 2(wh), where l=length, w=width, h=height.

I don't see this approaching the answer they provide.

Any ideas on where I'm going wrong, or how I'm misinterpreting their solution?

Thanks again!
 

Attachments

  • Q1.59.JPG
    Q1.59.JPG
    50.6 KB · Views: 894
Physics news on Phys.org
I might be missing something but where did you get this rectangle from? If you then enclose this infinite sheet in a cube, you have an infinite cube. I don't really see how there would be an electric field from a charge an infinite distance away.
 
The flux crossing one side of the cube is the scalar product of the electric field with the normal of the surface. There are two sides of the cube perpendicular to the electric field, the other four sides are parallel, resulting in zero flux.

ehild
 
Moderator's note: thread moved to Introductory Physics.
 
ehild said:
The flux crossing one side of the cube is the scalar product of the electric field with the normal of the surface. There are two sides of the cube perpendicular to the electric field, the other four sides are parallel, resulting in zero flux.

ehild

I would say there are two sides parallel, and four sides perpenicular to the electric field.

If I have a infinite long sheet of charge, the electric field vectors are going to point straight up and down.

If I were to put this sheet in the xy plane the electric field vectors would point in the positive & negative z directions.

I agree that there will be 4 sides with no flux flowing out of them, but the portions of the cube above and below the sheet should have flux flowing out of them with their electric field vectors parallel to the vector normal to the top/bottom of the cube.

So basically,

E \oint_{S}dS = \frac{Q_{enclosed}}{\epsilon_{0}}

But what is the surface area of one side of the cube? They denote this surface area as,

S_{0}

So the flux flowing out of one side of the cube is,

ES_{0} = \frac{Q_{enclosed}}{\epsilon_{0}}

So the total flux flowing out of the cube is double that, (i.e. it flows out 2 sides, top and bottom)

2ES_{0} = \frac{Q_{enclosed}}{\epsilon_{0}}

The charge enclosed will be,

\rho_{s} \cdot S_{0}

Thus,

E = \frac{\rho_{s}S_{0}}{2S_{0}\epsilon_{0}} = \frac{\rho_{s}}{2\epsilon_{0}}

I'm fairly certain this is the correct way to think about the problem.
 
Correct.

ehild
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
23
Views
5K
Replies
10
Views
4K