Gaussian Surface Derivations

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving a solid nonconducting sphere with a non-uniform charge distribution, specifically focusing on deriving the electric field inside the sphere based on the given charge density. The subject area includes concepts from electrostatics and Gaussian surfaces.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants attempt to derive the total charge and electric field using different methods, including integration and ratios. Some question the assumption of treating the charge density as constant, while others explore alternative approaches without integration.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with various attempts to derive the electric field and total charge. Some participants have provided hints and corrections regarding the integration process, while others express confusion about the expected form of the answer. There is no explicit consensus on the correct approach yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of a non-uniform charge density and the implications for integration. There is a focus on ensuring that the calculations align with the problem's requirements, and some participants highlight the need for careful consideration of the charge density's dependence on radius.

nealh149
Messages
110
Reaction score
0
For the following Eo is epsillon zero



Homework Statement



41. A solid nonconducting spere of radius R has a uniform charge distribution of volume charge density p = kr/R where k is constant and r is the distance from the center. Show the (a) the total charge on the sphere is Q = pikR^3. (I did this, it's fine) and (b) that

E = (1/(4piEo)(Q0R^4)(r^2) gives the magnitude of the electric field inside the sphere.

The Attempt at a Solution




41. For 41 (b) I tried to set up an integral. I new that Q = pV

Thus: Q = (kr/R)(4/3)(pi)(r^2) = [4kr^3(pi)}/[3R]

Because the gaussian surface is spherically symmetric

E = Q/(Eo*A) E = {[4kr^3(pi)}/[3R]} / (Eo*(4(pi)r^2)

This reduces to (kr)/(3EoR)

My proof seems to work alright, but it's not what the book asks you to find.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
nealh149 said:
41. For 41 (b) I tried to set up an integral. I new that Q = pV

Thus: Q = (kr/R)(4/3)(pi)(r^2) = [4kr^3(pi)}/[3R]
To find the charge, you need to integrate p dV. What you did was treat p as a constant--it's not constant, it's a function of r.
 
I tried to do it a totally different way, without any integration.

We know because density is a funciton of r we can set up a ratio.

Total Charge / Total Volume = Enclosed Charge / Enclosed Volume

Total Charge * Enclosed Volume / Total Volume = Enclosed Charge

So (pikR^3)(4pir^2) / (4piR^2) Q enclosed = [pi][k][r^3]

So put this into the Electric Field Formula

EA = Q/Eo So E = Q/AEo So E = ([pi][k][r^3])/(4pir^2)/Eo

So E = kr/4Eo

This seems logically correct, but not what there looking for. Can somebody give me some hints on how to do this correctly?
 
nealh149 said:
I tried to do it a totally different way, without any integration.
You must integrate!

We know because density is a funciton of r we can set up a ratio.

Total Charge / Total Volume = Enclosed Charge / Enclosed Volume
This would be true if the charge density were constant, but it's not.

Instead, integrate:

Q = \int \rho dV = \int \frac{kr}{R} 4 \pi r^2 dr
 
Q = \int \rho dV = \int \frac{kr}{R} 4 \pi r^2 dr = \frac{kr}\int{R}4 \pi r^2

Thus Q = (4kpiR^3)/3 plugged into the gauss formula from before you get kR/3Eo

Still not working. I'm really having trouble
 
Redo that integral to get Q. I wrote it so you can see where each term originates--to do the actual integration, combine the r factors.
 
Ok I got (kr^2)/(4REo) Still Different.
 
To put the answer in the form they want, eliminate k. Use the formula you derived for total Q (in your first post).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
771