1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Gaussian Surface Derivations

  1. Mar 8, 2007 #1
    For the following Eo is epsillon zero



    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

    41. A solid nonconducting spere of radius R has a uniform charge distribution of volume charge density p = kr/R where k is constant and r is the distance from the center. Show the (a) the total charge on the sphere is Q = pikR^3. (I did this, it's fine) and (b) that

    E = (1/(4piEo)(Q0R^4)(r^2) gives the magnitude of the electric field inside the sphere.

    3. The attempt at a solution


    41. For 41 (b) I tried to set up an integral. I new that Q = pV

    Thus: Q = (kr/R)(4/3)(pi)(r^2) = [4kr^3(pi)}/[3R]

    Because the gaussian surface is spherically symmetric

    E = Q/(Eo*A) E = {[4kr^3(pi)}/[3R]} / (Eo*(4(pi)r^2)

    This reduces to (kr)/(3EoR)

    My proof seems to work alright, but it's not what the book asks you to find.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Mar 8, 2007 #2

    Doc Al

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    To find the charge, you need to integrate p dV. What you did was treat p as a constant--it's not constant, it's a function of r.
     
  4. Mar 8, 2007 #3
    I tried to do it a totally different way, without any integration.

    We know because density is a funciton of r we can set up a ratio.

    Total Charge / Total Volume = Enclosed Charge / Enclosed Volume

    Total Charge * Enclosed Volume / Total Volume = Enclosed Charge

    So (pikR^3)(4pir^2) / (4piR^2) Q enclosed = [pi][k][r^3]

    So put this into the Electric Field Formula

    EA = Q/Eo So E = Q/AEo So E = ([pi][k][r^3])/(4pir^2)/Eo

    So E = kr/4Eo

    This seems logically correct, but not what there looking for. Can somebody give me some hints on how to do this correctly?
     
  5. Mar 8, 2007 #4

    Doc Al

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    You must integrate!

    This would be true if the charge density were constant, but it's not.

    Instead, integrate:

    [tex]Q = \int \rho dV = \int \frac{kr}{R} 4 \pi r^2 dr[/tex]
     
  6. Mar 8, 2007 #5
    [tex]Q = \int \rho dV = \int \frac{kr}{R} 4 \pi r^2 dr = \frac{kr}\int{R}4 \pi r^2[/tex]

    Thus Q = (4kpiR^3)/3 plugged into the gauss formula from before you get kR/3Eo

    Still not working. I'm really having trouble
     
  7. Mar 8, 2007 #6

    Doc Al

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    Redo that integral to get Q. I wrote it so you can see where each term originates--to do the actual integration, combine the r factors.
     
  8. Mar 8, 2007 #7
    Ok I got (kr^2)/(4REo) Still Different.
     
  9. Mar 8, 2007 #8

    Doc Al

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    To put the answer in the form they want, eliminate k. Use the formula you derived for total Q (in your first post).
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Gaussian Surface Derivations
  1. Gaussian surfaces (Replies: 1)

  2. Gaussian surface (Replies: 4)

  3. Gaussian surface (Replies: 2)

  4. Gaussian Surfaces (Replies: 16)

Loading...