Bound charges of a block (top and bottom surface)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the bound charges on the top and bottom surfaces of a charged block using Gauss' law. Participants emphasize the importance of the electric displacement field, denoted as ##\mathbf{D}##, and its relationship to the electric field ##\vec{E}##. The correct approach involves using a Gaussian surface to determine the displacement field at the surfaces, leading to the conclusion that ##D = \frac{\sigma}{2}## at the top and bottom surfaces, where ##\sigma## is the surface charge density. The total charge within the Gaussian surface is expressed as ##Q = \rho_f \cdot t \cdot A##, linking the volume charge density to the area and thickness of the slab.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Gauss' law and its application to electric fields and displacement fields.
  • Familiarity with electric displacement field concepts and the relationship between ##\vec{E}## and ##\mathbf{D}##.
  • Knowledge of charge density, including volume charge density ##\rho_f## and surface charge density ##\sigma##.
  • Basic calculus for integrating electric fields to find potential differences.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Gauss' law for different geometries, particularly for slabs and planes.
  • Learn about the relationship between electric displacement field ##\mathbf{D}## and electric field ##\vec{E}## in dielectrics.
  • Explore the concept of bound charges and how they relate to free charges in dielectric materials.
  • Review examples of calculating electric fields for infinite planes with surface charge density ##\sigma##.
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, electrical engineers, and anyone involved in electrostatics or studying electric fields in materials will benefit from this discussion.

  • #31
TSny said:
You have not used the correct value for the free charge density ##\rho## of the electron layer.
Please include units with the numerical values.
Yes, I saw that, I edited too late.

All right,
##D = \frac{0.02 c/m^3 \cdot 0.002m}{2} = 0.00002 c/m^2##
##E = 705896 v/m##

Finally, I found ##\sigma = -0.000014 c/m^2## for both surface of the block.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
EpselonZero said:
Yes, I saw that, I edited too late.

All right,
##D = \frac{0.02 c/m^3 \cdot 0.002m}{2} = 0.00002 c/m^2##
##E = 705896 v/m##

Finally, I found ##\sigma = -0.000014 c/m^2## for both surface of the block.
Those answers look correct. :oldsmile:

The values that you give for D and E are good for points inside the dielectric except for points within the electron layer. (Of course, we are using an approximation where we are neglecting any fringing of the fields.)

The use of scientific notation and rounding to an appropriate number of significant figures would be nice.
 
  • #33
All right, I have few more questions.
I found E and D using free charges inside the slab. however, since I don't have free charges inside the other part of the dielectric does it means that ##\sigma_f = 0## and ##\rho_f = 0##, even if a dielectric has a polarization density.
 
  • #34
Yes. This system has "free" volumen charge only un the central slab
 
  • #35
All right, it took me some time to understand, but thank you both for your help. Things all clearer now.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TSny
  • #36
For dielectrics that are linear, isotropic, and homogeneous, we have ##\vec P = \epsilon_0 \chi_e \vec E## where ##\chi_e## is a constant related to the relative permittivity, ##\epsilon_r##: ##\chi_e = \epsilon_r - 1##.

For these dielectrics, it is not hard to derive a useful relation between the bound charge density ##\rho_{b}## and free charge density ##\rho_f## that holds for any point inside the dielectric.

##\large \rho_b = - \frac{\chi_e }{\epsilon_r}\rho_f \,\,\,\,\,## (This type of relation does not hold for the the surface charge densities ##\sigma_b## and ##\sigma_f##.)

You can use this to get the bound volume charge density ##\rho_b## inside the electron layer. Then you can check that the total bound charge of the dielectric is zero, as it must be.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
874
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K