Gauss's Law application in Electrostatics

AI Thread Summary
Coulomb's law states that all charges, both internal and external to a Gaussian surface, contribute to the electric field. The discussion highlights confusion regarding whether the electric flux calculated using only internal charges would be greater than, equal to, or less than that calculated with the total field. It is clarified that when considering both internal and external charges, the flux remains equal due to Gauss's law, which states that the flux is proportional to the total enclosed charge. Thus, the flux through the Gaussian surface is consistently equal regardless of the inclusion of external charges. The conclusion reinforces that the answer to the flux comparison is indeed "equal to."
vcsharp2003
Messages
913
Reaction score
179
Homework Statement
Consider the Gaussian surface that surrounds part of charge distribution shown in diagram below.

(a) Which of the charges contribute to the electric field at point P?

(b) Would the value obtained for the flux through the surface, calculated using only the field due to ##q_1## and ##q_2##, be greater than, equal to, or less than that obtained using the total field?

MY PROBLEM IS WITH PART (B)
Relevant Equations
##F = \dfrac {Kq_1q_2} {r^2}##, which is the Coulomb's law
##\phi = \dfrac{\sum {q_i}} {{\epsilon}_0}##, which is Gauss's law
(a) Due to Coulomb's law all charges whether internal or external to Gaussian surface will contribute to the electric field. This is also mentioned as it's correct answer.

(b) The answer is "equal to", which makes no sense to me. It could be greater than, equal to, or less than that obtained using the total field since it will depend on the magnitudes of these individual charges.
16272437420066624548394785749685.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
vcsharp2003 said:
Homework Statement:: Consider the Gaussian surface that surrounds part of charge distribution shown in diagram below.

(a) Which of the charges contribute to the electric field at point P?

(b) Would the value obtained for the flux through the surface, calculated using only the field due to ##q_1## and ##q_2##, be greater than, equal to, or less than that obtained using the total field?

MY PROBLEM IS WITH PART (B)
Relevant Equations:: ##F = \dfrac {Kq_1q_2} {r^2}##, which is the Coulomb's law
##\phi = \dfrac{\sum {q_i}} {{\epsilon}_0}##, which is Gauss's law

(a) Due to Coulomb's law all charges whether internal or external to Gaussian surface will contribute to the electric field. This is also mentioned as it's correct answer.

(b) The answer is "equal to", which makes no sense to me. It could be greater than, equal to, or less than that obtained using the total field since it will depend on the magnitudes of these individual charges.View attachment 286573
I get it now. If we considered the following two cases: (1) only internal charges and (2) internal plus external charges, then the flux through the Gaussian surface would be ## \dfrac {q_1 + q_2} {{\epsilon}_0} ## in both cases according to Gauss's law.
Thus the answer to part (b) of my question is "equal to".
 
  • Like
Likes SammyS, Delta2 and Charles Link
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Back
Top