Gauss's Law applied to Gravational Flux

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Gauss's Law applied to gravitational flux indicates that the gravitational flux through a closed surface is defined as -4πGM, where M represents the mass enclosed. In the case of a long straight cylinder with radius R and constant density ρ, the gravitational field at a distance r from the axis is derived to be f = -2G(π)ρr for r < R. The confusion arises regarding the factor of 2 in the expression for f, with some participants suggesting it should be f = -G(π)ρr. The consensus confirms that the factor of 2 is indeed correct.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Gauss's Law in gravitational contexts
  • Familiarity with gravitational flux and its mathematical representation
  • Knowledge of cylindrical coordinates and their application in physics
  • Basic calculus for evaluating integrals in physics problems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of gravitational fields using Gauss's Law
  • Explore applications of Gauss's Law in different geometries, such as spheres and planes
  • Learn about gravitational potential and its relation to gravitational fields
  • Investigate the implications of constant density materials in gravitational calculations
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in gravitational theory and its mathematical applications, particularly in the context of Gauss's Law.

dm9292
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Gauss's Law states that the gravatational flux crossing a closed surface is -4piGM, where M is the mass inside the surface.

A Long straight cylinder has a radius R and is made of material of a constant density of p
Show that the gravatational field at a distance r from the axis of the cylinder is proportional to r, for r<R.

Homework Equations



f.da = (closed integral) -4piGM

The Attempt at a Solution



I enclosed the cylinder in a Gaussian surface

Mass Enclosed is pi(r)^2lp
f is constant therefore, f.da = f.2(pi)rl

So by gauss's law:

f.2(pi)rl = -4piG[pi(r)^2lp]

So f = -2G(pi)pr.

The problem is when i compare with people they get f = -G(pi)pr.

Is this correct? Either shows that f proportional to r. But the constant 2 is confusing me, should it be there or not?

Any help would be greatly appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think the factor of 2 is correct.
 
Thanks for confirming that
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 83 ·
3
Replies
83
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K