General relativity question - geodesics.

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
6 replies · 2K views
ghetom
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
I'm doing some revision for a General relativity exam, and came across this question:

A Flat Earth space-time has co-ordinates (t, x, y, z), where z > 0, and a metric

ds2 = ((1 + gz)2)dt2 − dx2 − dy2 − dz2

where g is a positive constant.
Write down the geodesic equations in this space-time.

Hence, or otherwise, show that A Flat Earth physicist, stationary at a point with z = h, will measure a ‘gravitational acceleration’ of magnitude g(1 + gh)−1

---//---

I've solved the geodesics, but can't get the 'show that' at the end:

Using the Euler-Lagrange equation:

[tex]\stackrel{d}{ds} \stackrel{\partial L}{\partial \dot{x^{\mu}}} - \stackrel{\partial L}{\partial x^{\mu}} =0[/tex]

I get

[tex]\ddot{z} = 2g(1+gz)\dot{t}^2[/tex]

And

[tex]\dot{t} = E/(1+gz)^2[/tex] ( where E is a constant )

So

[tex]\ddot{z} = g{E^2}/(1+gz)^3[/tex]

which isn't right. Alternatively,

[tex]\ddot{z}= \dot{t}^2 z'' + \ddot{t}z'[/tex] ( where ' is (d/dt) )

it's stationary, so z' = 0 thus [tex]z''=\ddot{z}/\dot{t}^2=2g(1+gz)[/tex]

which still isn't right. Any takers?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think the two in your geodesic equation shouldn't be there. You probably missed the 1/2 in the Christoffel symbol. Moreover you made a mistake in trying to find an expression for [itex](dt/ d\tau)^2[/itex]. Can you show us how you obtained your expression?
 
Last edited:
Yes the 2 is wrong. My apologies.

For the mu = 0 equation I have:

[tex](d/ds)(2\dot{t}(1+gz)^2) =0[/tex]

thus

[tex]\dot{t} (1+gz)^2 = constant[/tex]

also

[tex]\ddot{z} = \dot{t}d\dot{z}/dt = \dot{t}(d/dt)(\dot{t}z') = \dot{t}(z'(d\dot{t})/dt +\dot{t}z'')=\dot{t}^2z''+\ddot{t}z'[/tex]
 
Last edited:
Update: I've now solved it using the Christoffel symbols, but am still confused as to why the Euler-Lagrange method hasn't worked.This is wrong:
[tex]\ddot{z} = -g{\dot{t}^2}(1+gz)[/tex] (1)

It should read:

[tex]\ddot{z} =-g{\dot{t}^2}/(1+gz)[/tex] (2)

I got (1) direct from the EL equation

[tex]-2\ddot{z} - {\dot{t}^2}d_{z}(1+gz)^2 = 0[/tex] (3)
 
Last edited:
You're probably losing terms in places where you should be summing over the indices. Using the EL-equations I end up with [itex]\ddot{z}-g(1+gz)\dot{t}^2 =0[/itex].

Your second equation is wrong as well. Did you derive that one using the geodesic equation? Either way I just calculated it both ways and I get the same result, as it should be. I can't be of further assistance unless you show me your full derivation. Also I don't think you have gotten your [itex]\dot{t}[/itex] correct yet.
 
Last edited:
Thanks. Given that's the case then [tex]z''=\ddot{z}/\dot{t}^2=g(1+gz)[/tex] can't be true (since this is the wrong answer).

I can't see any thing wrong for [tex]\dot{t}[/tex]:

whats wrong with:
[tex]L = (1+gz)^2dt^2-dx^2-dy^2-dz^2)[/tex]

therefore by EL:

[tex](d/ds)(2\dot{t}(1+gz)^2) =0[/tex]

so

[tex]\dot{t} (1+gz)^2 = constant[/tex]
 
Your Lagrangian is wrong, recall [itex]L=g_{\alpha \beta}\dot{x}^\alpha\dot{x}^\beta=(1+gz)^2 \dot{t}^2-\dot{x}^2-\dot{y}^2-\dot{z}^2[/itex].
 
Last edited: