General Relativity - Riemann Tensor and Killing Vector Identity

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 6K views
Tangent87
Messages
146
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I am trying to show that for a vector field Va which satisfies [tex]V_{a;b}+V_{b;a}[/tex] that [tex]V_{a;b;c}=V_eR^e_{cba}[/tex] using just the below identities.

Homework Equations



[tex]V_{a;b;c}-V_{a;c;b}=V_eR^e_{abc}[/tex](0)

[tex]R^e_{abc}+R^e_{bca}+R^e_{cab}=0[/tex] (*)

[tex]V_{a;b}+V_{b;a}=0[/tex] (**)

The Attempt at a Solution


So far I have:

[tex]V_eR^e_{cba}=-V_eR^e_{acb}-V_eR^e_{bac}=V_{a;b;c}-V_{a;c;b}+V_{b;c;a}-V_{b;a;c}=2V_{a;b;c}+V_{b;c;a}-V_{a;c;b}[/tex]

Which gives:

[tex]V_eR^e_{cba}-V_{a;b;c}=V_eR^e_{abc}-V_{c;b;a}[/tex]

I want to say that this implies [tex]V_{a;b;c}=V_eR^e_{cba}[/tex] but I can't justify why both sides of the above equation must be zero. Can anyone see what else I can do? Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem is part of a larger question (see page 59 here http://www.maths.cam.ac.uk/undergrad/pastpapers/2004/Part_2/list_II.pdf ) and I'm having trouble with the last bit as well where it goes into the EM stuff, I know it must obviously somehow relate to everything we've done above but I just don't see the relevance.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Can anybody help me out with deriving the identity [tex] V_{a;b;c}=V_eR^e_{cba}?[/tex]

Forget about the EM stuff I don't care so much about that but I'd be very grateful for some help in deriving that identity. Thanks
 
There's a couple of ways to show that. One way is to start from (*) and use (0) to write 6 terms involving the 2nd derivatives of the V's. Then you can use (**) to show that

[tex]V_{a;bc} + V_{b;ca} + V_{c;ab} =0.[/tex]

You can then use (**) and (0) to show that

[tex]V_{b;ca} + V_{c;ab} = V_e {R^e}_{cab}.[/tex]
 
fzero said:
There's a couple of ways to show that. One way is to start from (*) and use (0) to write 6 terms involving the 2nd derivatives of the V's. Then you can use (**) to show that

[tex]V_{a;bc} + V_{b;ca} + V_{c;ab} =0.[/tex]

You can then use (**) and (0) to show that

[tex]V_{b;ca} + V_{c;ab} = V_e {R^e}_{cab}.[/tex]

Ahhh thanks, done it now. It seems I was definitely going about it the wrong way.