General rule for a confusing series

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving a general formula for the sum of powers of integers, specifically the expression (1^a) + (2^a) + (3^a) + ... + (n^a) for positive integers n and a. It highlights established results such as the formula involving Bernoulli Polynomials and the Hurwitz zeta function for integer values of m. The conversation emphasizes the method of proving such formulas through telescoping series and the relationship between summation and difference sequences.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of mathematical induction
  • Familiarity with Bernoulli Polynomials
  • Knowledge of the Hurwitz zeta function
  • Basic concepts of telescoping series
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties and applications of Bernoulli Polynomials
  • Study the Hurwitz zeta function and its significance in number theory
  • Explore mathematical induction techniques for proving series formulas
  • Learn about telescoping series and their use in summation proofs
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone interested in advanced summation techniques and mathematical proofs, particularly in the context of series and sequences.

Jesseac
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am a year 12 IB maths HL student... and i was wondering about the possibility of a general rule for a particular problem... I was looking at the following rules, which came up in a basic textbook exercise on mathematical induction.

1+2+3+4+...+n=(n^2+n)/2 where n is a positive integer
(1^2)+(2^2)+...+(n^2)=(n(n+1)(2n+1))/6, where n is a positive integer

I was wondering if there exists a rule for the case.

(1^a)+(2^a)+(3^a)+(4^a)+...+(n^a), where both n and a are positive integers.

This problem has been bugging me for quite some time. I had the feeling that the problem may be slightly different for odd values of a as opposed to even values of a.

Also, if there does indeed exist a general rule or rules for this case, I was wondering if someone could give an outline as to the method used to prove this (as I'm not so confident in attempting it for myself).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
yes it exists in terms of the Hurwitz zeta function or Bernoulli Polynomials

if 'm' is an integer

[tex]1+2^{m}+...+k^{m} = \frac{B_{m+1}(k)-B_{m+1}(0)}{m+1}[/tex]

otherwise you need the Hurwitz zeta function.. look at this at wikipedia.
 
Jesseac said:
if someone could give an outline as to the method used to prove this (as I'm not so confident in attempting it for myself).

I don't know a general rule for discovering formulas for sums, but proving they work is often straightforward. If you think that [tex]\sum_{i=0}^n a_i = G(n)[/tex]
then see if you can write [tex]G(n)[/tex] as [tex]F(n+1) - F(0)[/tex] for some [tex]F(n)[/tex] with the property that [tex]\triangle F(n) = F(n+1) - F(n) = a_n[/tex].

If you can do that, you're done, since for such a [tex]F(n)[/tex],

[tex]\sum_{i=0}^n a_n = \sum_{i=0}^n (F(n+1)-F(n))[/tex]

[tex]=(F[1] - F[0]) + (F[2] - F[1] ) + (F(3) - F(2)) + ... (F(n+1) - F(n) )[/tex]

which "telescopes" to [tex]F(n+1) - F(0)[/tex]

Example: [tex]a_n = n[/tex]
[tex]G(n) = \frac{(n)(n+1)}{2}[/tex]
[tex]F(n) = \frac{(n-1)(n)}{2}[/tex]

[tex]\triangle F(n) = \frac{(n)(n+1)}{2} - \frac{(n-1)(n)}{2}[/tex]
[tex]= \frac{n^2 + n}{2} - \frac{n^2 - n }{2} = n = a_n[/tex]
You can also invent summation formulas for complicated looking sequences by setting [tex]F(n)[/tex] equal to some formula and working backwards to the series that it sums.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
Replies
48
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K