Generalization of a theorem in Real Analysis

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on generalizing a theorem in real analysis regarding the intersection of compact subsets in a metric space. The original theorem states that if every finite intersection of a collection of compact sets is nonempty, then the intersection of all sets is also nonempty. Participants suggest that a potential generalization could involve infinite subcollections, but question the validity of this approach, arguing it may render the statement redundant. Additionally, the conversation touches on the possibility of extending the theorem's applicability to broader types of spaces, such as normal spaces, where the concept of compactness may differ. The importance of maintaining the theorem's integrity while exploring generalizations is emphasized.
Silviu
Messages
612
Reaction score
11

Homework Statement


If ##\{K_\alpha\}## is a collection of compact subsets of a metric space X, such that the intersection of every finite subcollection of {##K_\alpha##} is nonempty, then ##\cap K_\alpha## is nonempty. Generalize this theorem and proof the generalization. Why doesn't it make sense to state the theorem in its general form?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I know how to prove the actual theorem, but I don't really know what is its generalization in order to attempt to prove it. I don't want yet a proof of the generalization, just its statement. Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Silviu said:

Homework Statement


If ##\{K_\alpha\}## is a collection of compact subsets of a metric space X, such that the intersection of every finite subcollection of {##K_\alpha##} is nonempty, then ##\cap K_\alpha## is nonempty. Generalize this theorem and proof the generalization. Why doesn't it make sense to state the theorem in its general form?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I know how to prove the actual theorem, but I don't really know what is its generalization in order to attempt to prove it. I don't want yet a proof of the generalization, just its statement. Thank you.
Seems to me that the generalization would change "finite subcolledtion" to "infinite subcollection."
 
Mark44 said:
Seems to me that the generalization would change "finite subcolledtion" to "infinite subcollection."
Thank you for your reply. However, doesn't that make the statement redundant? If any infinite intersection is non-empty, the intersection of all K is by assumption non-empty, so there is nothing left to prove (and it seems actually weaker than the other one).
 
Silviu said:

Homework Statement


If ##\{K_\alpha\}## is a collection of compact subsets of a metric space X, such that the intersection of every finite subcollection of {##K_\alpha##} is nonempty, then ##\cap K_\alpha## is nonempty. Generalize this theorem and proof the generalization. Why doesn't it make sense to state the theorem in its general form?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I know how to prove the actual theorem, but I don't really know what is its generalization in order to attempt to prove it. I don't want yet a proof of the generalization, just its statement. Thank you.

There are generalizations of metric spaces. See, eg., https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Normal_space . In some of those spaces you might be able to generalize the concept of "compactness"; see, eg., https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compact_space

Perhaps a version of your cited theorem remains true for some of those generalizations.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K