Generalized coordinates - Rotating pendulum

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the use of generalized coordinates in the context of a rotating pendulum. Specifically, the participant questions why the angle of rotation about the axis is not considered a generalized coordinate when formulating the Hamiltonian for the system. It is established that if the rotation around the axis is not influenced by gravity, the coordinate is cyclic, leading to the conservation of its time-derivative. This insight clarifies the relationship between angular velocity and the inclusion of the rotational angle in the Hamiltonian formulation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hamiltonian mechanics
  • Familiarity with generalized coordinates
  • Knowledge of cyclic coordinates in physics
  • Basic principles of angular motion
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Hamiltonian mechanics in detail
  • Research the concept of cyclic coordinates and their implications
  • Learn about the dynamics of rotating systems
  • Explore the relationship between angular velocity and generalized coordinates
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, mechanical engineers, and researchers in classical mechanics who are interested in advanced topics related to generalized coordinates and Hamiltonian systems.

assed
Messages
26
Reaction score
1
My question is kinda simple but it has been causing me some trouble for a while. In the problem of the pendulum rotating about an axis, why isn't the angle of rotation about the axis a generalized coordinate? The doubt appears when i try to write the hamiltonian for the system and i don't know if i include the term relative to that angle.
How that's related to the fact that the angular velocity is or not constant.
Thanks in advance.
( The problem considered is of a simple pendulum, but with its axis of oscillation rotating)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the orientation of that axis? If rotation around it is not influenced by gravity, the coordinate is cyclic (I think this is what you are looking for?) and its time-derivative is conserved.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K