Generalized vectors. Eigenvalues/Eigenvectors.

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
7 replies · 3K views
Messages
2,076
Reaction score
140

Homework Statement



Let [itex]A \in M_{22} (\mathbb{R})[/itex] with one single eigenvalue λ and one single eigenvector v. We denote w the generalized vector such that [itex](A - λI)w = v[/itex]. Prove that v and w are linearly independent.

Homework Equations



I know that if A has only one eigenvalue λ and one eigenvector v that the equation Av = λv is satisfied. That is, (A - λI)v = 0.

The Attempt at a Solution



I thought about this a bit, but I'm having trouble getting this one going. I thought about letting B = (A - λI) so that we get two equations :

Bv = 0 and Bw = v

Then I thought that it could be broken down into two cases, one where λ = 0 and one where λ ≠ 0, but I'm not sure this is the right path to take.

Any pointers?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Zondrina said:

Homework Statement



Let [itex]A \in M_{22} (\mathbb{R})[/itex] with one single eigenvalue λ and one single eigenvector v. We denote w the generalized vector such that [itex](A - λI)w = v[/itex]. Prove that v and w are linearly independent.

Homework Equations



I know that if A has only one eigenvalue λ and one eigenvector v that the equation Av = λv is satisfied. That is, (A - λI)v = 0.

The Attempt at a Solution



I thought about this a bit, but I'm having trouble getting this one going. I thought about letting B = (A - λI) so that we get two equations :

Bv = 0 and Bw = v

Then I thought that it could be broken down into two cases, one where λ = 0 and one where λ ≠ 0, but I'm not sure this is the right path to take.

Any pointers?

What's the definition of linearly independent?
 
There are several equivalent things, but if [itex]v_1, ..., v_n[/itex] is a set of vectors, then [itex]v_1, ..., v_n[/itex] are L.I if the equation :

[itex]c_1v_1, ..., c_nv_n = 0[/itex]

has only a trivial solution. That is all the scalars are zero.
 
Zondrina said:
There are several equivalent things, but if [itex]v_1, ..., v_n[/itex] is a set of vectors, then [itex]v_1, ..., v_n[/itex] are L.I if the equation :

[itex]c_1v_1, ..., c_nv_n = 0[/itex]

has only a trivial solution. That is all the scalars are zero.

That's the one. So if c1*v+c2*w=0 you want to show c1 and c2 are 0. Start by applying B to that equation. What do you conclude from that?
 
Last edited:
Okay so we want to show : [itex]c_1v + c_2w = 0[/itex] has only the trivial solution.

We know that if we multiply both sides by B = (A-λI) we get :

[itex]B(c_1v + c_2w) = 0[/itex]
[itex]c_1Bv + c_2Bw = 0[/itex]

We know that Bv = 0 because v is an eigenvector for the matrix A.

[itex]c_2Bw = 0[/itex]

We also know that Bw = v since w is our generalized vector.

[itex]c_2v = 0[/itex]

Now, since eigenvectors are non-zero, it must be the case that c2 = 0.
 
Zondrina said:
Okay so we want to show : [itex]c_1v + c_2w = 0[/itex] has only the trivial solution.

We know that if we multiply both sides by B = (A-λI) we get :

[itex]B(c_1v + c_2w) = 0[/itex]
[itex]c_1Bv + c_2Bw = 0[/itex]

We know that Bv = 0 because v is an eigenvector for the matrix A.

[itex]c_2Bw = 0[/itex]

We also know that Bw = v since w is our generalized vector.

[itex]c_2v = 0[/itex]

Now, since eigenvectors are non-zero, it must be the case that c2 = 0.

Sure. Now put c2=0 into your original equation. What do you conclude about c1?
 
Now subbing c2 back into our original equation yields :

[itex]c_1v = 0[/itex]

Once again, since v is an eigenvector, it is non-zero. Which tells us that c1 must be zero.

Thus, c1 = c2 = 0 which implies that v and w are linearly independent.

EDIT : Q.E.D

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Zondrina said:

Homework Statement



Let [itex]A \in M_{22} (\mathbb{R})[/itex] with one single eigenvalue λ and one single eigenvector v. We denote w the generalized vector such that [itex](A - λI)w = v[/itex]. Prove that v and w are linearly independent.

Homework Equations



I know that if A has only one eigenvalue λ and one eigenvector v that the equation Av = λv is satisfied. That is, (A - λI)v = 0.
That's true for any A such that [itex]\lambda[/itex] is an eigenvalue with eigenvector v. The fact that A has only that eigenvalue and one independent eigenvector, tells you that there exist a vector u such that [itex]A- \lambda I)u\ne 0[/itex] but that [itex](A- \lambda I)^2u= 0[/itex].

(It is never true that a linear operator has "one single eigenvector" because any multiple of an eigenvector is an eigenvector.)

The Attempt at a Solution



I thought about this a bit, but I'm having trouble getting this one going. I thought about letting B = (A - λI) so that we get two equations :

Bv = 0 and Bw = v

Then I thought that it could be broken down into two cases, one where λ = 0 and one where λ ≠ 0, but I'm not sure this is the right path to take.

Any pointers?