Generate a triangular waveform using Multisim/MATLAB

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fatima Hasan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Waveform
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around generating a triangular waveform using Multisim and MATLAB, with users troubleshooting circuit setups involving op-amps. Issues were raised about voltage rail connections and component configurations, particularly the connection of a capacitor to an op-amp pin. Suggestions included breaking the circuit into two op-amps and verifying connections at nodes to ensure proper functionality. A critical point highlighted was the importance of capacitor values, with a user successfully resolving their issue by changing the capacitor to 0.1uF, leading to the desired waveform output. The conversation emphasizes the need for careful circuit design and component selection in simulation software.
Fatima Hasan
Messages
315
Reaction score
14
Homework Statement
Attached below.
Relevant Equations
-
Using any Electrical Engineering software:
lab2temp2.png


I tried to solve this question using Multisim. Here's my attempt:

exp2-temp.png
That's what I got :
exp2-temp.png


Kindly,could someone tell me where is my mistake ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Does each small subsection work? I would try breaking it up into two op-amps then see if each one works with that setup.

I don't know much about the circuit setup in that software I am noticing that on the right op-amp the way the voltage rails are connected looks different from the first one. Is that okay or allowed?
 
Joshy said:
I am noticing that on the right op-amp the way the voltage rails are connected looks different from the first one. Is that okay or allowed?
It's the same as the figure shown above.
I didn't get any error.
 
Joshy said:
I don't know much about the circuit setup in that software
I tried to simulate in MATLAB but I didn't find op-amp 741.
 
Is C1 really connected to U3-6? I don't see a dot there.
 
DaveE said:
Is C1 really connected to U3-6? I don't see a dot there.
Yes, it is connected.
screenshot_115.png
 
What's the VDD seemingly floating or is it connected to the offset? Right up against the offset pins on U3.

Earlier comment I was meaning between the left and right op-amp; not just the reference image. You assign VDD and VCC to each op-amp, but for some reason the one on the right says VCC and 15V. It's inconsistent. I suppose if the nets are equal then maybe it doesn't matter... wasn't sure.
 
Joshy said:
What's the VDD seemingly floating or is it connected to the offset? Right up against the offset pins on U3.

Earlier comment I was meaning between the left and right op-amp; not just the reference image. You assign VDD and VCC to each op-amp, but for some reason the one on the right says VCC and 15V. It's inconsistent. I suppose if the nets are equal then maybe it doesn't matter... wasn't sure.
I tried.. I didn't get the required waveform..
 
Can you break up the two op-amps around the center put and put an input voltage source to each one; measure the output to see if you're getting what you expect? Maybe omit R1 for now.
 
  • #10
  • #11
DaveE said:
At pin 6, the output?
No, I didn't connect the capacitor to pin 6.
Sorry for misunderstanding, I didn't read your previous question well.
 
  • #12
Fatima Hasan said:
No, I didn't connect the capacitor to pin 6.
Sorry for misunderstanding, I didn't read your previous question well.
It should be. Try it that way.
 
  • #13
DaveE said:
It should be. Try it that way.
screenshot-115.png

The result:
screenshot-115.png
 
  • #14
Now check that every component at that node is connected. If you make all connections a "T" intersection with a dot, then you'll know. Or verify it some other way, like the netlist for example.
 
  • #15
DaveE said:
Now check that every component at that node is connected. If you make all connections a "T" intersection with a dot, then you'll know. Or verify it some other way, like the netlist for example.
I checked. C1, R1, pin6 , and channel A (oscilloscope) are connected together at the same node, but the result is the same (straight line at the origin).
 
  • #16
Are you sure C1 should be 100pF. My rough calculation says that the ramp of the triangle (the time it takes C1 to charge) should be about 7V/usec. That is much faster than a 741 op-amp can change it's output (slew rate is about 0.1 V/usec). Also, your oscilloscope is set in the msec range. That is an odd combination for a circuit like this. Still, I'm not sure why it wouldn't oscillate at some frequency.
Try a larger value for C1, like 0.1uF maybe.
 
  • Like
Likes Jody and Fatima Hasan
  • #17
DaveE said:
Are you sure C1 should be 100pF. My rough calculation says that the ramp of the triangle (the time it takes C1 to charge) should be about 7V/usec. That is much faster than a 741 op-amp can change it's output (slew rate is about 0.1 V/usec). Also, your oscilloscope is set in the msec range. That is an odd combination for a circuit like this. Still, I'm not sure why it wouldn't oscillate at some frequency.
Try a larger value for C1, like 0.1uF maybe.
Got it !
After changing the value of the capacitor to 0.1uF.
screenshot-115.png


Thanks for your help.
 
  • Like
Likes DaveE

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
8K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
8K