Geodesic in Weak Field Limit: Introducing Einstein's Relativity

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the derivation and understanding of the geodesic equation in the context of Einstein's relativity, particularly focusing on the Newtonian limit and the implications of Taylor series expansions in this framework. Participants explore the mathematical steps involved in arriving at the expression involving the term "(1+O(ε))" and its relation to the geodesic equation.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how the term "(1+O(ε))" is derived in the context of the geodesic equation.
  • Another participant references a specific equation from the text, suggesting that a Taylor series expansion of the square root is necessary to understand the derivation.
  • Several participants debate the correct interpretation of the Taylor series expansion, with some asserting it results in "(1+O(ε))" rather than "(1+O(ε²))".
  • There is a suggestion that the authors could have provided clearer explanations regarding the steps leading to the geodesic equation.
  • One participant mentions that the term "d²x^α/dt²" is of order O(ε), which is relevant to the discussion but remains somewhat unclear to others.
  • Another participant expresses a desire to clarify the mathematical steps involved without skipping any details.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the derivation of the term "(1+O(ε))" and continue to express differing interpretations of the mathematical steps involved. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the correct application of Taylor series in this context.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include potential misunderstandings of the Taylor series expansion and the specific mathematical steps taken in the derivation of the geodesic equation, which some participants feel are inadequately explained in the source material.

GR191511
Messages
76
Reaction score
6
I'm reading《Introducing Einstein's Relativity_ A Deeper Understanding Ed 2》on page 180,it says:

since we are interested in the Newtonian limit,we restrict our attention to the spatial part of the geodesic equation,i.e.when a=##\alpha####\quad ##,and we obtain,by using ##\frac{d\tau}{dt}=1+O(\varepsilon^2)##:
##\frac {\partial^2 x^\alpha} {\partial t^2}+\Gamma^\alpha{}_{bc}\frac{dx^b}{dt}\frac{dx^c}{dt}(1+O(\varepsilon))=0##.##\quad ##I wonder how the auther gets "(1+O(##\varepsilon##))"?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The authors (D'Inverno & Vickers) explained that on p179, just before eq(10.43). Do you not understand how eq(10.43) was obtained? Their preceding (unnumbered) equation is $$c^2 d\tau^2 ~=~ c^2 dt^2 (1 - \varepsilon^2) ~.$$ Take the square root of both sides. You might have to expand ##\sqrt{1 - \varepsilon^2}## as a Taylor series in ##\varepsilon## to see why it ends up as ##\,1 - O(\varepsilon^2)##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK, topsquark and vanhees71
strangerep said:
You might have to expand ##\sqrt{1 - \varepsilon^2}## as a Taylor series in ##\varepsilon## to see why it ends up as ##\,1 - O(\varepsilon^2)##.
Thanks!But it doesn't end up as"##1+O(\varepsilon^2)##",it is"##1+O(\varepsilon)##"
 
GR191511 said:
it doesn't end up as"##1+O(\varepsilon^2)##",it is"##1+O(\varepsilon)##"
Check your work. Doing a Taylor series expansion of ##\sqrt{1 + \varepsilon^2}## does not mean you take the square root of ##\varepsilon^2##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark and Vanadium 50
PeterDonis said:
Check your work. Doing a Taylor series expansion of ##\sqrt{1 + \varepsilon^2}## does not mean you take the square root of ##\varepsilon^2##.
I mean the geodesic "##\frac {\partial^2 x^\alpha} {\partial t^2}+\Gamma^\alpha{}_{bc}\frac{dx^b}{dt}\frac{dx^c}{dt}(1+O(\varepsilon))=0## "it ends up as ##(1+O(\varepsilon))##
 
GR191511 said:
I mean the geodesic "##\frac {\partial^2 x^\alpha} {\partial t^2}+\Gamma^\alpha{}_{bc}\frac{dx^b}{dt}\frac{dx^c}{dt}(1+O(\varepsilon))=0## "it ends up as ##(1+O(\varepsilon))##
You make it much harder to help you if you don't show your work. I'm guessing you haven't correctly followed the author's instructions after eq(10.46).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark and vanhees71
strangerep said:
You make it much harder to help you if you don't show your work. I'm guessing you haven't correctly followed the author's instructions after eq(10.46).
##\frac {d^2 x^\alpha} {d \tau^2}+\Gamma^\alpha{}_{bc}\frac{dx^b}{d\tau}\frac{dx^c}{d\tau}=0\Rightarrow\frac{d}{d\tau}(\frac{dx^\alpha}{dt}\frac{dt}{d\tau})+\Gamma^\alpha{}_{bc}\frac{dx^b}{dt}\frac{dx^c}{dt}\frac{dt}{d\tau}\frac{dt}{d\tau}=0\Rightarrow##
##\left[\frac{d}{dt}(\frac{dx^\alpha}{dt}\frac{dt}{d\tau})\right]\frac{dt}{d\tau}+\Gamma^\alpha{}_{bc}\frac{dx^b}{dt}\frac{dx^c}{dt}\frac{dt}{d\tau}\frac{dt}{d\tau}=0\Rightarrow\frac{d}{dt}(\frac{dx^\alpha}{dt}\frac{dt}{d\tau})+####\Gamma^\alpha{}_{bc}\frac{dx^b}{dt}\frac{dx^c}{dt}\frac{dt}{d\tau}=0\Rightarrow\frac{d^2x^\alpha}{dt^2}\frac{dt}{d\tau}+\frac{dx^\alpha}{dt}\frac{d}{dt}(\frac{dt}{d\tau})####+\Gamma^\alpha{}_{bc}\frac{dx^b}{dt}\frac{dx^c}{dt}\frac{dt}{d\tau}=0####\Rightarrow\frac{d^2x^\alpha}{dt^2}\frac{dt}{d\tau}+0+\Gamma^\alpha{}_{bc}\frac{dx^b}{dt}\frac{dx^c}{dt}\frac{dt}{d\tau}=0\Rightarrow\frac{d^2x^\alpha}{dt^2}+\Gamma^\alpha{}_{bc}\frac{dx^b}{dt}\frac{dx^c}{dt}####=0####\Rightarrow\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{d^2x^\alpha}{dt^2}+\frac{1}{c^2}\Gamma^\alpha{}_{bc}\frac{dx^b}{dt}\frac{dx^c}{dt}=0####\quad##So where is the ##1+O(\varepsilon)##?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dale
OK, it's actually a lot simpler than what you've written in post #7.

From (10.43) we have ##d\tau = dt + O(\varepsilon^2)##. That means you can replace all the ##d\tau##'s in the derivatives by ##dt##. (Think of those derivatives as ratios of differentials.)

The trick they don't seem to explain is that ##d^2 x^\alpha/dt^2## is ##O(\varepsilon)##, as is ##\Gamma^a_{~bc}##, which is shown in (10.45) as an ##\varepsilon## term plus ##O(\varepsilon^2)##. In the geodesic equation after (10.46), they divided throughout by 1 factor of ##\varepsilon##.

(Is that explanation sufficient? I'll agree they probably could have been clearer.)
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dale and vanhees71
strangerep said:
OK, it's actually a lot simpler than what you've written in post #7.

From (10.43) we have ##d\tau = dt + O(\varepsilon^2)##. That means you can replace all the ##d\tau##'s in the derivatives by ##dt##. (Think of those derivatives as ratios of differentials.)

The trick they don't seem to explain is that ##d^2 x^\alpha/dt^2## is ##O(\varepsilon)##, as is ##\Gamma^a_{~bc}##, which is shown in (10.45) as an ##\varepsilon## term plus ##O(\varepsilon^2)##. In the geodesic equation after (10.46), they divided throughout by 1 factor of ##\varepsilon##

(Is that explanation sufficient? I'll agree they probably could have been clearer.)
Why is "##d^2 x^\alpha/dt^2## is ##O(\varepsilon)##"related with this question?
Do you mean it is ##\frac{\varepsilon}{c^2}\frac{d^2x^\alpha}{dt^2}+\frac{\varepsilon}{c^2}\Gamma^\alpha{}_{bc}\frac{dx^b}{dt}\frac{dx^c}{dt}(1+O(\varepsilon))=0##before" they divided throughout by 1 factor of ##\varepsilon##"?Thank you!
 
  • #10
GR191511 said:
Why is "##d^2 x^\alpha/dt^2## is ##O(\varepsilon)##"related with this question?
Do you mean it is ##\frac{\varepsilon}{c^2}\frac{d^2x^\alpha}{dt^2}+\frac{\varepsilon}{c^2}\Gamma^\alpha{}_{bc}\frac{dx^b}{dt}\frac{dx^c}{dt}(1+O(\varepsilon))=0##before" they divided throughout by 1 factor of ##\varepsilon##"?Thank you!
That's the general idea. But... (sigh)... now you've got me wanting to rewrite that stuff properly without skipping steps. Probably not today though.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: GR191511

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
623
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K