Geodesic in Weak Field Limit: Introducing Einstein's Relativity

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the geodesic equation in the weak field limit as presented in "Introducing Einstein's Relativity: A Deeper Understanding Ed 2" by D'Inverno & Vickers. Participants analyze the derivation of the term "(1+O(ε))" in the context of the geodesic equation, specifically equation (10.43). The discussion emphasizes the importance of Taylor series expansion for understanding the relationship between the differentials and the geodesic equation, clarifying that the correct interpretation leads to the conclusion that the second derivative of position with respect to time is of order O(ε).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of geodesic equations in general relativity
  • Familiarity with Taylor series expansions
  • Knowledge of differential equations and their applications in physics
  • Basic concepts of Einstein's relativity and weak field approximations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the geodesic equation in weak fields using "Introducing Einstein's Relativity" by D'Inverno & Vickers
  • Learn about Taylor series expansions and their applications in physics
  • Explore the implications of the weak field limit in general relativity
  • Investigate the relationship between differentials and derivatives in the context of physics
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, particularly those studying general relativity, mathematicians interested in differential equations, and educators seeking to clarify concepts related to geodesic equations and Taylor series expansions.

GR191511
Messages
76
Reaction score
6
I'm reading《Introducing Einstein's Relativity_ A Deeper Understanding Ed 2》on page 180,it says:

since we are interested in the Newtonian limit,we restrict our attention to the spatial part of the geodesic equation,i.e.when a=##\alpha####\quad ##,and we obtain,by using ##\frac{d\tau}{dt}=1+O(\varepsilon^2)##:
##\frac {\partial^2 x^\alpha} {\partial t^2}+\Gamma^\alpha{}_{bc}\frac{dx^b}{dt}\frac{dx^c}{dt}(1+O(\varepsilon))=0##.##\quad ##I wonder how the auther gets "(1+O(##\varepsilon##))"?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The authors (D'Inverno & Vickers) explained that on p179, just before eq(10.43). Do you not understand how eq(10.43) was obtained? Their preceding (unnumbered) equation is $$c^2 d\tau^2 ~=~ c^2 dt^2 (1 - \varepsilon^2) ~.$$ Take the square root of both sides. You might have to expand ##\sqrt{1 - \varepsilon^2}## as a Taylor series in ##\varepsilon## to see why it ends up as ##\,1 - O(\varepsilon^2)##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK, topsquark and vanhees71
strangerep said:
You might have to expand ##\sqrt{1 - \varepsilon^2}## as a Taylor series in ##\varepsilon## to see why it ends up as ##\,1 - O(\varepsilon^2)##.
Thanks!But it doesn't end up as"##1+O(\varepsilon^2)##",it is"##1+O(\varepsilon)##"
 
GR191511 said:
it doesn't end up as"##1+O(\varepsilon^2)##",it is"##1+O(\varepsilon)##"
Check your work. Doing a Taylor series expansion of ##\sqrt{1 + \varepsilon^2}## does not mean you take the square root of ##\varepsilon^2##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark and Vanadium 50
PeterDonis said:
Check your work. Doing a Taylor series expansion of ##\sqrt{1 + \varepsilon^2}## does not mean you take the square root of ##\varepsilon^2##.
I mean the geodesic "##\frac {\partial^2 x^\alpha} {\partial t^2}+\Gamma^\alpha{}_{bc}\frac{dx^b}{dt}\frac{dx^c}{dt}(1+O(\varepsilon))=0## "it ends up as ##(1+O(\varepsilon))##
 
GR191511 said:
I mean the geodesic "##\frac {\partial^2 x^\alpha} {\partial t^2}+\Gamma^\alpha{}_{bc}\frac{dx^b}{dt}\frac{dx^c}{dt}(1+O(\varepsilon))=0## "it ends up as ##(1+O(\varepsilon))##
You make it much harder to help you if you don't show your work. I'm guessing you haven't correctly followed the author's instructions after eq(10.46).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark and vanhees71
strangerep said:
You make it much harder to help you if you don't show your work. I'm guessing you haven't correctly followed the author's instructions after eq(10.46).
##\frac {d^2 x^\alpha} {d \tau^2}+\Gamma^\alpha{}_{bc}\frac{dx^b}{d\tau}\frac{dx^c}{d\tau}=0\Rightarrow\frac{d}{d\tau}(\frac{dx^\alpha}{dt}\frac{dt}{d\tau})+\Gamma^\alpha{}_{bc}\frac{dx^b}{dt}\frac{dx^c}{dt}\frac{dt}{d\tau}\frac{dt}{d\tau}=0\Rightarrow##
##\left[\frac{d}{dt}(\frac{dx^\alpha}{dt}\frac{dt}{d\tau})\right]\frac{dt}{d\tau}+\Gamma^\alpha{}_{bc}\frac{dx^b}{dt}\frac{dx^c}{dt}\frac{dt}{d\tau}\frac{dt}{d\tau}=0\Rightarrow\frac{d}{dt}(\frac{dx^\alpha}{dt}\frac{dt}{d\tau})+####\Gamma^\alpha{}_{bc}\frac{dx^b}{dt}\frac{dx^c}{dt}\frac{dt}{d\tau}=0\Rightarrow\frac{d^2x^\alpha}{dt^2}\frac{dt}{d\tau}+\frac{dx^\alpha}{dt}\frac{d}{dt}(\frac{dt}{d\tau})####+\Gamma^\alpha{}_{bc}\frac{dx^b}{dt}\frac{dx^c}{dt}\frac{dt}{d\tau}=0####\Rightarrow\frac{d^2x^\alpha}{dt^2}\frac{dt}{d\tau}+0+\Gamma^\alpha{}_{bc}\frac{dx^b}{dt}\frac{dx^c}{dt}\frac{dt}{d\tau}=0\Rightarrow\frac{d^2x^\alpha}{dt^2}+\Gamma^\alpha{}_{bc}\frac{dx^b}{dt}\frac{dx^c}{dt}####=0####\Rightarrow\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{d^2x^\alpha}{dt^2}+\frac{1}{c^2}\Gamma^\alpha{}_{bc}\frac{dx^b}{dt}\frac{dx^c}{dt}=0####\quad##So where is the ##1+O(\varepsilon)##?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dale
OK, it's actually a lot simpler than what you've written in post #7.

From (10.43) we have ##d\tau = dt + O(\varepsilon^2)##. That means you can replace all the ##d\tau##'s in the derivatives by ##dt##. (Think of those derivatives as ratios of differentials.)

The trick they don't seem to explain is that ##d^2 x^\alpha/dt^2## is ##O(\varepsilon)##, as is ##\Gamma^a_{~bc}##, which is shown in (10.45) as an ##\varepsilon## term plus ##O(\varepsilon^2)##. In the geodesic equation after (10.46), they divided throughout by 1 factor of ##\varepsilon##.

(Is that explanation sufficient? I'll agree they probably could have been clearer.)
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dale and vanhees71
strangerep said:
OK, it's actually a lot simpler than what you've written in post #7.

From (10.43) we have ##d\tau = dt + O(\varepsilon^2)##. That means you can replace all the ##d\tau##'s in the derivatives by ##dt##. (Think of those derivatives as ratios of differentials.)

The trick they don't seem to explain is that ##d^2 x^\alpha/dt^2## is ##O(\varepsilon)##, as is ##\Gamma^a_{~bc}##, which is shown in (10.45) as an ##\varepsilon## term plus ##O(\varepsilon^2)##. In the geodesic equation after (10.46), they divided throughout by 1 factor of ##\varepsilon##

(Is that explanation sufficient? I'll agree they probably could have been clearer.)
Why is "##d^2 x^\alpha/dt^2## is ##O(\varepsilon)##"related with this question?
Do you mean it is ##\frac{\varepsilon}{c^2}\frac{d^2x^\alpha}{dt^2}+\frac{\varepsilon}{c^2}\Gamma^\alpha{}_{bc}\frac{dx^b}{dt}\frac{dx^c}{dt}(1+O(\varepsilon))=0##before" they divided throughout by 1 factor of ##\varepsilon##"?Thank you!
 
  • #10
GR191511 said:
Why is "##d^2 x^\alpha/dt^2## is ##O(\varepsilon)##"related with this question?
Do you mean it is ##\frac{\varepsilon}{c^2}\frac{d^2x^\alpha}{dt^2}+\frac{\varepsilon}{c^2}\Gamma^\alpha{}_{bc}\frac{dx^b}{dt}\frac{dx^c}{dt}(1+O(\varepsilon))=0##before" they divided throughout by 1 factor of ##\varepsilon##"?Thank you!
That's the general idea. But... (sigh)... now you've got me wanting to rewrite that stuff properly without skipping steps. Probably not today though.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: GR191511

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
502
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
963
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K