Geoff Haselhurst: Banned for Speaking Against Scientific Inquisition

  • Thread starter Thread starter ShyTalk
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Geoff Haselhurst was banned from a scientific forum for defending the SSW theory against criticisms, which some view as an unjust action. Critics argue that the forum's behavior resembles an oppressive regime rather than a platform for scientific discourse. The discussion references Galileo's historical struggles with scientific authority, emphasizing the importance of individual reasoning over collective opinion. Some participants suggest that Haselhurst should publish his theory in a peer-reviewed journal before engaging further in the forum. The conversation highlights tensions between established scientific norms and the expression of unconventional ideas.
ShyTalk
I note that Geoff Haselhurst has been banned for no good reason other than making a very reasonable response to some wild criticisms of the SSW theory he supports.
I find it absolutely laughable that a scientific 'message board' which no doubt considers itself a paragon of 'scientific' objectivity in reality behaves like a deliquent squad run by the Spanish inquisition.

Galileo's remarks about such 'scientific' standards do of course remain as true today as they were 100s of years ago:

"I wish, my dear Kepler, that we could have a good laugh together at the extraordinary stupidity of the mob. What do you think of the foremost philosophers of this University? In spite of my oft-repeated efforts and invitations, they have refused, with the obstinacy of a glutted adder, to look at the planets or Moon or my telescope. ...
In questions of science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of a single individual"
(Galileo Galilei)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Whatever you say, Geoff.
 
ShyTalk said:
I note that Geoff Haselhurst has been banned for no good reason other than making a very reasonable response to some wild criticisms of the SSW theory he supports.

Tell Geoff that when he has published his theory in a peer reviewed journal, then he is more than welcome to post it here for discussion. Until then, he must abide by the rules for non-mainstream, unpublished theories, budding Galileo or not.
 
  • Like
Likes Timmy Lee
I want to thank those members who interacted with me a couple of years ago in two Optics Forum threads. They were @Drakkith, @hutchphd, @Gleb1964, and @KAHR-Alpha. I had something I wanted the scientific community to know and slipped a new idea in against the rules. Thank you also to @berkeman for suggesting paths to meet with academia. Anyway, I finally got a paper on the same matter as discussed in those forum threads, the fat lens model, got it peer-reviewed, and IJRAP...
About 20 years ago, in my mid-30s (and with a BA in economics and a master's in business), I started taking night classes in physics hoping to eventually earn the science degree I'd always wanted but never pursued. I found physics forums and used it to ask questions I was unable to get answered from my textbooks or class lectures. Unfortunately, work and life got in the way and I never got further the freshman courses. Well, here it is 20 years later. I'm in my mid-50s now, and in a...
Back
Top