Geometic Series that sums to circle?

111111
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Does anyone know if there is a way to divide up the area of a circle using similar polygons, with a common ratio? I was just curious if there is a way, or if it has been proven impossible.

For example, I tried inscribing a square inside a circle and making an infinite series of triangles with the remaining area, but the triangles do not have a common ratio.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
IF we can write the area of the unit disk as the limit of a geometric series, then, with a0 being the area of the largest sub-figure, and k the constant ratio, then we would necessarily have the following equation:

\frac{a_{0}}{1-k}=\pi

But, since the ratio between rational numbers itself must be rational, it follows that either a0, k, or both must be irrational numbers.

And that sort of deflates the attractiveness of the procedure, don't you agree?
 
This probably doesn't make a difference but the area of circle is equal to pi*r^2 where r is the radius of the circle.

But I don't know why that would deflate the attractiveness of the procedure. Why couldn't the ratio be the sqrt(2) or something?
 
I was talking about the "unit disk", with radius equal to 1.

Well, sure it could be 1/square root of two or whatever else, but to construct some nasty irrational number is generally more difficult than a simple rational ratio.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top