- #1

- 446

- 0

What is the geometric multiplicity?

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter Ted123
- Start date

- #1

- 446

- 0

What is the geometric multiplicity?

- #2

Dick

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 26,260

- 619

What is the geometric multiplicity?

Well, what's the definition of geometric multiplicity?

- #3

- 446

- 0

Well, what's the definition of geometric multiplicity?

If we have a matrix [itex]A[/itex] and eigenvalue [itex]\lambda[/itex] then by definition the geometric multiplicity of [itex]\lambda[/itex] is the dimension of [itex]\text{Ker}(A-\lambda I)[/itex] which is just the dimension of the eigenspace.

So if we have found an eigenvector, say [itex]\begin{bmatrix} 1 \\ 1 \\ 0 \end{bmatrix}[/itex] then what is the geometric multiplicity? i.e. what is the dimension of the eigenspace? Is it the number of non-zero elements of an eigenvector or the number of different non-zero elements?

- #4

Dick

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 26,260

- 619

If we have a matrix [itex]A[/itex] and eigenvalue [itex]\lambda[/itex] then by definition the geometric multiplicity of [itex]\lambda[/itex] is the dimension of [itex]\text{Ker}(A-\lambda I)[/itex] which is just the dimension of the eigenspace.

So if we have found an eigenvector, say [itex]\begin{bmatrix} 1 \\ 1 \\ 0 \end{bmatrix}[/itex] then what is the geometric multiplicity? i.e. what is the dimension of the eigenspace? Is it the number of non-zero elements of an eigenvector or the number of different non-zero elements?

It's neither of those. It's the number of elements in a basis for your eigenspace. You've figured out that all of the eigenvectors are multiples of a single vector. So what's the dimension?

- #5

- 446

- 0

It's neither of those. It's the number of elements in a basis for your eigenspace. You've figured out that all of the eigenvectors are multiples of a single vector. So what's the dimension?

How do I write a basis for the eigenspace? Won't the eigenspace for an eigenvalue

- #6

Dick

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 26,260

- 619

How do I write a basis for the eigenspace? Won't the eigenspace for an eigenvaluealwaysbe multiples of an eigenvector?

You just wrote a basis for the eigenspace. It's [1,1,2]. It spans the eigenspace. You might want to review the definition of basis and dimension. If the eigenspace had been given by [x,y,2x]^T, it would be two dimensional. What would be a basis for that?

- #7

Dick

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 26,260

- 619

You just wrote a basis for the eigenspace. It's [1,1,2]. It spans the eigenspace. You might want to review the definition of basis and dimension. If the eigenspace had been given by [x,y,2x]^T, it would be two dimensional. What would be a basis for that?

Ack. I misread your post. I thought you'd written [1,1,2]. All of the vectors in [x,x,2x]^T are multiples of the single vector [1,1,2]^T. Yes?

- #8

- 446

- 0

You just wrote a basis for the eigenspace. It's [1,1,2]. It spans the eigenspace. You might want to review the definition of basis and dimension. If the eigenspace had been given by [x,y,2x]^T, it would be two dimensional. What would be a basis for that?

A question I've just done has an eigenvector [tex]\begin{bmatrix} 1 \\ 4 \\ 2 \end{bmatrix}[/tex] for an eigenvalue (from the equation [itex]x=\frac{1}{4}y=\frac{1}{2}z[/itex]).

How do I know whether this is the only linearly independent eigenvector in a basis for the eigenspace? (I know the algebraic multiplicity is 2 and that the geometric multiplicity must be less than or equal to this).

- #9

Dick

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 26,260

- 619

A question I've just done has an eigenvector [tex]\begin{bmatrix} 1 \\ 4 \\ 2 \end{bmatrix}[/tex] for an eigenvalue (from the equation [itex]x=\frac{1}{4}y=\frac{1}{2}z[/itex]).

How do I know whether this is the only linearly independent eigenvector in a basis for the eigenspace? (I know the algebraic multiplicity is 2 and that the geometric multiplicity must be less than or equal to this).

It's one dimensional again. All the eigenvectors have the form [x,4x,2x]^T. They are all multiples of a single vector [1,4,2]^T. So that single vector is a basis.

- #10

- 446

- 0

It's one dimensional again. All the eigenvectors have the form [x,4x,2x]^T. They are all multiples of a single vector [1,4,2]^T. So that single vector is a basis.

In another question all the eigenvector equations are multiples of [itex]2x-y-2z=0[/itex]

In this case the geometric multiplicity is 2 - how do you know there are 2 linearly independent eigenvectors?

[tex]\begin{bmatrix} 1 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{bmatrix}[/tex] and [tex]\begin{bmatrix} 1 \\ 2 \\ 0 \end{bmatrix}[/tex] are 2 linearly independent eigenvectors but isn't[tex]\begin{bmatrix}0 \\ 2 \\ -1 \end{bmatrix}[/tex] a 3rd?

Last edited:

- #11

Dick

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 26,260

- 619

In another question all the eigenvector equations are multiples of [itex]2x-y-2z=0[/itex]

In this case the geometric multiplicity is 2 - how do you know there are 2 linearly independent eigenvectors?

Solve for z in terms of x and y. So z=x-y/2. That means if you know x and y then z is determined. So it's a two parameter solution, it's a plane. It's two dimensional. Now you tell me a basis for it. Two linearly independent solutions that span the plane.

- #12

- 446

- 0

Solve for z in terms of x and y. So z=x-y/2. That means if you know x and y then z is determined. So it's a two parameter solution, it's a plane. It's two dimensional. Now you tell me a basis for it. Two linearly independent solutions that span the plane.

[tex]\begin{bmatrix} 1 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{bmatrix}[/tex] and [tex]\begin{bmatrix} 1 \\ 2 \\ 0 \end{bmatrix}[/tex] are 2 linearly independent eigenvectors but isn't[tex]\begin{bmatrix}0 \\ 2 \\ -1 \end{bmatrix}[/tex] a 3rd?

- #13

Dick

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 26,260

- 619

[tex]\begin{bmatrix} 1 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{bmatrix}[/tex] and [tex]\begin{bmatrix} 1 \\ 2 \\ 0 \end{bmatrix}[/tex] are 2 linearly independent eigenvectors but isn't[tex]\begin{bmatrix}0 \\ 2 \\ -1 \end{bmatrix}[/tex] a 3rd?

[0,2,-1]=(1)*[1,2,0]+(-1)*[1,0,1]. No, the third vector isn't linearly independent of the first two.

- #14

- 446

- 0

[0,2,-1]=(1)*[1,2,0]+(-1)*[1,0,1]. No, the third vector isn't linearly independent of the first two.

So it is!

If you have a zero in an eigenvector, say[tex]\begin{bmatrix} 1 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{bmatrix}[/tex] then how does this affect things? Does it reduce the dimension by 1?

- #15

Dick

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 26,260

- 619

So it is!

If you have a zero in an eigenvector, say[tex]\begin{bmatrix} 1 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{bmatrix}[/tex] then how does this affect things? Does it reduce the dimension by 1?

I really think you should review vector spaces and linear independence. Why do you think having a zero component in a vector has anything to do with it????

Share: