Geothermal heat pump or heat engine power requirements

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the evaluation of a geothermal heating system's performance, specifically whether it operates as a reversible heat pump or a heat engine. The context includes maintaining a house temperature of 21.0 degrees C while extracting thermal energy from a geothermal reservoir at 347 K, with outdoor temperatures at 0.0 degrees C.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the definitions and roles of heat pumps versus heat engines, questioning the relevance of the outdoor temperature and the nature of heat flow in the system. Some participants attempt to relate the system's performance to the theoretical efficiencies of reversible systems.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with various interpretations of the system's operation being explored. Some participants suggest that the system functions as a heat engine, while others emphasize the need for clarity on the concept of reversibility in this context. There is no explicit consensus on whether the heating system is reversible, but several participants provide insights into the theoretical aspects of heat transfer and efficiency.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential ambiguities in the problem statement, particularly regarding the classification of the system as a heat pump or heat engine. There is a discussion about the implications of the temperature differences and the work required for heat transfer.

bkraabel
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In winter, you like to keep your house interior at 21.0 degrees C. Your geothermal
heating system, which was advertised as being reversible, draws thermal energy from an
underground reservoir at 347 K. In a cold winter, with the average outdoor temperature
being 0.0 degrees C, thermal energy escapes from the house at a rate of 1000 W +-5 percent.
Distributing the thermal energy supplied by the heating system throughout the house
requires 180 W (provided by the heating system). Is your heating system reversible
within your 5% margin of error, or was the advertisement false? Ignore any inefficiency
in converting electrical energy to mechanical energy

Homework Equations


For reversible heat pump, coefficient of performance is the maximum possible:
COP_{max} =\frac{T_{out}}{T_{out}-T_{in}}
where T_{in}=273 K and T_{out}=294 K (I think).

For reversible heat engine (Carnot engine), maximum efficiency is
\eta_{max} =1-\frac{T_{out}}{T_{in}}
where T_{in}=347 K and T_{out}=294 K (I think).

The Attempt at a Solution


I don't see how to relate these efficiencies (or anything else) to the power requirements of 1180 W. Also, I don't see how the outdoor temperature of 0 Celsius is relevant; it seems like we're just transferring heat from the ground to the house.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
bkraabel said:

Homework Statement


In winter, you like to keep your house interior at 21.0 degrees C. Your geothermal
heating system, which was advertised as being reversible, draws thermal energy from an
underground reservoir at 347 K. In a cold winter, with the average outdoor temperature
being 0.0 degrees C, thermal energy escapes from the house at a rate of 1000 W +-5 percent.
Distributing the thermal energy supplied by the heating system throughout the house
requires 180 W (provided by the heating system). Is your heating system reversible
within your 5% margin of error, or was the advertisement false? Ignore any inefficiency
in converting electrical energy to mechanical energy

Homework Equations


For reversible heat pump, coefficient of performance is the maximum possible:
COP_{max} =\frac{T_{out}}{T_{out}-T_{in}}
where T_{in}=273 K and T_{out}=294 K (I think).

For reversible heat engine (Carnot engine), maximum efficiency is
\eta_{max} =1-\frac{T_{out}}{T_{in}}
where T_{in}=347 K and T_{out}=294 K (I think).

The Attempt at a Solution


I don't see how to relate these efficiencies (or anything else) to the power requirements of 1180 W. Also, I don't see how the outdoor temperature of 0 Celsius is relevant; it seems like we're just transferring heat from the ground to the house.
The problem is poorly drafted because this is not a heat pump. A heat pump causes heat flow from a cooler reservoir to a warmer reservoir. Mechancial work is needed to cause this heat flow. But in this case, the heat will flow without work. You just have to cause air to circulate through the hot reservoir and return to the house.You could run a heat engine between the geothermal reservoir and the house and heat the house that way. Reversing this would cause heat to flow from the house to the geothermal reservoir - that would be a heat pump.

AM
 
I agree with AM that a heat pump pumps heat, usually against the gradient. It could pump it with the gradient, it's true, but that is not useful. A reversible one can pump against the gradient in either direction, i.e. whichever way the gradient runs.
The description seems to be that of a heat engine, generating power (180W+) from the gradient. You know the source and sink temperatures and the heat flow, so you can calculate the theoretical power output. You can then compare that with the 180W. But what any of that has to do with 'is it reversible' I have no idea.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
I agree with Haruspex that this does not appear to have anything to do with reversibility. The work output of the heat engine is not used to drive a thermodynamic process. It just facilitates natural heat flow. Furthermore, the heat is escaping from the 21° C house to a 0° C reservoir which is obviously not reversible. You don't need to do any calculation to see that even if you could save that output of the heat engine, there is no way to reverse the heat flow - more work would be needed due to the extra temperature difference.

AM
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
reversible heat engine

Ok, after further reflection, I think the device is working as a heat engine between the ground and the interior of the house. The "waste" heat is dumped into the house to keep it warm (1000 W) and the work (180 W) is used to distribute this heat. For a reversible (Carnot) engine, the efficiency is
\eta=1-\frac{T_{out}}{T_{in}}=15\%
From the data given, we know that the heat engine draws 1180 W from the ground, so its real efficiency would be
\eta_{real}=W/Q_{in}=15\%
which would suggest that this is, indeed, a reversible engine.
 
bkraabel said:
Ok, after further reflection, I think the device is working as a heat engine between the ground and the interior of the house. The "waste" heat is dumped into the house to keep it warm (1000 W) and the work (180 W) is used to distribute this heat. For a reversible (Carnot) engine, the efficiency is
\eta=1-\frac{T_{out}}{T_{in}}=15\%
From the data given, we know that the heat engine draws 1180 W from the ground, so its real efficiency would be
\eta_{real}=W/Q_{in}=15\%
which would suggest that this is, indeed, a reversible engine.
That looks right.
 
bkraabel said:
Ok, after further reflection, I think the device is working as a heat engine between the ground and the interior of the house. The "waste" heat is dumped into the house to keep it warm (1000 W) and the work (180 W) is used to distribute this heat. For a reversible (Carnot) engine, the efficiency is
\eta=1-\frac{T_{out}}{T_{in}}=15\%
From the data given, we know that the heat engine draws 1180 W from the ground, so its real efficiency would be
\eta_{real}=W/Q_{in}=15\%
which would suggest that this is, indeed, a reversible engine.
Does that make the heating system reversible? That was the question.

AM
 
I think it makes the engine a reversible engine because only a reversible engine can have the maximum theoretical Carnot efficiency.
 
Andrew Mason said:
Does that make the heating system reversible? That was the question.

If the original question has been quoted accurately, either it is a trick question or the questioner does not understand what is meant by a reversible heat pump. I would answer it with words like: The information provided gives no evidence either way on whether it is a reversible heat pump; it does however indicate that it is a reversible heat engine.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K