News Gerard't Hooft Interview

  • Thread starter Thread starter jedishrfu
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Gerard ’t Hooft, a prominent Dutch theoretical physicist and Nobel Prize winner, emphasizes the need for a deeper understanding of quantum mechanics, which he describes as fundamentally flawed. He advocates for superdeterminism, suggesting that a more expansive approach to mathematical theories is necessary for advancing physics. The discussion highlights the importance of risk-taking and innovative thinking among younger researchers, contrasting this with the caution often seen in established scientists. While acknowledging the limitations of past theories, such as Einstein's unified field theory, the conversation also critiques the tendency of some laureates to delve into pseudoscience, positioning ’t Hooft as a more grounded figure in the scientific community.
Messages
15,439
Reaction score
10,138
Scientific American interviews Prof Gerard t'Hooft

https://www.scientificamerican.com/...d-t-hooft-says-quantum-mechanics-is-nonsense/

In the pantheon of modern physics, few figures can match the quiet authority of Gerard ’t Hooft. The Dutch theoretical physicist, now a professor emeritus at Utrecht University in the Netherlands, has spent much of the past half-century reshaping our understanding of the fundamental forces that knit together reality. But ’t Hooft’s unassuming, soft-spoken manner belies his towering scientific stature, which is better revealed by the mathematical rigor and deep physical insights that define his work—and by the prodigious numbers of prestigious prizes he has accrued, which include a Nobel Prize, a Wolf Prize, a Franklin Medal, and many more.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
He is just pushing for his version of superdeterminism.
 
  • Like
Likes dextercioby
Well, when you get to his level of eminence, you can say what you want. Even Einstein was critical of some things.

It's true that much of physics is filling the details of things we don't understand but has yet to reach the fundamental theory of everything. Sometimes, people need to take more risks, expand their mathematical knowledge and think outside the box as younger researchers do until they're told not to.
 
jedishrfu said:
Well, when you get to his level of eminence, you can say what you want. Even Einstein was critical of some things.
Unfortunately, Einstein unified field theory did not pay either. Same with Heisenberg, Dirac and others.
jedishrfu said:
It's true that much of physics is filling the details of things we don't understand but has yet to reach the fundamental theory of everything. Sometimes, people need to take more risks, expand their mathematical knowledge and think outside the box as younger researchers do until they're told not to.
Yeah, at least 't Hooft did not go for pseudoscience and spiritual stuff as some other Nobel laureates.
 
  • Like
Likes dextercioby and weirdoguy
Who besides Josephson?
 
Wow!
 
Back
Top