Giancoli, 3rd Ed, pr. 55: Ellastic collision. Solved, but is there easier way?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bjnartowt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Collision
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on an elastic collision problem involving a neutron and a helium nucleus, where the neutron collides with the helium nucleus at rest. The masses are approximately "m" for the neutron and "4m" for the helium nucleus. The helium nucleus rebounds at a 45-degree angle, and the participants derive equations based on conservation of kinetic energy and momentum to find the rebound angles and speeds of both particles. A key point raised is the potential to simplify the solution process to avoid using the quadratic formula, although it is noted that the quadratic can be factorable with correct algebraic manipulation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of elastic collisions in physics
  • Familiarity with conservation of momentum and energy principles
  • Knowledge of trigonometric functions and their application in physics
  • Ability to solve quadratic equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of scattering formulas in elastic collisions
  • Learn about the center of mass frame in collision problems
  • Explore alternative methods for solving quadratic equations in physics contexts
  • Review examples of momentum conservation in multi-body collisions
USEFUL FOR

Students preparing for the Physics GRE, physics educators, and anyone interested in mastering concepts of elastic collisions and momentum conservation.

bjnartowt
Messages
265
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement



A neutron collides elastically with an at-rest helium-nucleus. Masses are approximately "m" and "4m", respectively. Helium nucleus rebounds at 45-degree angle

What angle does the neutron rebound at?

What are speeds of two particles after collision?

Notation:
[tex]\begin{array}{l}<br /> {v_{4m}} = \left[ {{\rm{pre - collision He - nucleus velocity}}} \right] = 0 \\ <br /> {v_m} = \left[ {{\rm{pre - collision He - nucleus velocity}}} \right] = 6.5 \times {10^5}{\textstyle{m \over s}} \\ <br /> {{v'}_{4m}} = \left[ {{\rm{post - collision He - nucleus velocity}}} \right] = ? \\ <br /> {{v'}_m} = \left[ {{\rm{post - collision He - nucleus velocity}}} \right] = ? \\ <br /> \end{array}[/tex]



Homework Equations


Kinetic energy conservation, simplified, and with appropreiate zero of initial He-nucleus velocity put in, and with factor of (1/2)*m canceled out:
[tex]{v_m}^2 = 4{v'_{4m}}^2 + {v'_m}^2[/tex]

x-component momentum conservation with factor of "m" struck out:
[tex]6.5 \times {10^5}{\textstyle{m \over s}} = {{v'}_m}\cos \theta + 4{{v'}_{4m}}\cos 45[/tex]

y-component momentum conservation with factor of "m" struck out:
[tex]\sin \theta = - \sin 45{\textstyle{{{{v'}_{4m}}} \over {{{v'}_m}}}}[/tex]


The Attempt at a Solution



Isolate [tex]{{{v'}_m}}[/tex] and put next to trig functions and square both sides in preparation to add them together to get a [tex]{\sin ^2} + {\cos ^2}[/tex] simplification:

[tex]\begin{array}{l}<br /> {\left( {{{v'}_m}\cos \theta } \right)^2} = {\left( {6.5 \times {{10}^5}{\textstyle{m \over s}} - 2\sqrt 2 {{v'}_{4m}}} \right)^2} \\ <br /> {\left( {{{v'}_m}\sin \theta } \right)^2} = {\left( { - {{v'}_{4m}}\sin 45} \right)^2} \\ <br /> \end{array}[/tex]

Adding these equations and using the abovementioned [tex]{\sin ^2} + {\cos ^2}[/tex] leads to:
[tex]{({{v'}_m})^2} = {6.5^2} \times {10^{10}} + 8{({{v'}_{4m}})^2} - 2 \cdot 6.5 \times {10^5} \cdot 2\sqrt 2 {{v'}_{4m}} + {\textstyle{1 \over 2}}{({{v'}_{4m}})^2}[/tex]

Then: use the kinetic-energy balance mentioned way earlier to eliminate an unknown.


THE QUESTION: This leads to the quadratic formula. I am studying to take the Physics GRE. Is there a way to avoid the quadratic formula? Some sort of physical-intuition-shortcut? I tried visiting the CM frame briefly, but that makes things a bit messy...but perhaps I didn't look hard enough?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There's a mistake in your momentum y equation. You dropped the factor of four that comes from the mass of the helium nucleus.

Your approach is fine. The quadratic you get is factorable if you do the algebra correctly, with one root being v'4m=0. It might help not to plug in the value for vm so early.
 
I mean yeah, unless you know scattering formulas off the top of your head you will have to derive the result just like you have here. Though fix your error as stated above.
 

Similar threads

Replies
335
Views
17K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K