- #1
tsuwal
- 105
- 0
Homework Statement
Give a counter-example that shows Bolzano-Weirstrass is unvalid in IR2.
Intro:
Bolzano-Weirtrass theorem says that if a sequence (IN->IR) is bounded then there exists a convergent sub-sequence. (this is shown using the Cauchy sequence concept, showing that a Cauchy sequence is bounded and using the lemma of monotonic sub-sequences)
However, this is not valid valid in IR2, if a sequence (IN->IR2) is bounded then we can't assure that the exists a convergent sub-sequence.
Homework Equations
The Attempt at a Solution
It's not easy since you have the tendency of using a pattern. But I guess
Xn=(Cos(n),Sin(n)) might work...