How can Bolzano-Weiertrass theorem be used to prove Nested Interval Property?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cragar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Interval Proof
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around using the Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem to construct a proof for the Nested Interval Property, which states that a collection of closed intervals nested within each other has a non-empty intersection. Participants explore the relationship between bounded sequences and nested intervals in the context of real analysis.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss starting with a bounded sequence on a closed interval and making it smaller to find a convergent point. Others suggest beginning with an arbitrary family of nested closed intervals and question how to derive a bounded sequence from this family. There are inquiries about defining a sequence of real numbers from the intervals.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of how to apply the Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem in this context. Some guidance has been offered regarding the need for a bounded sequence and the proper setup for the proof, but no consensus has been reached on the exact approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the constraints of proving the Nested Interval Property while adhering to the requirements of the Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem. There is an emphasis on the necessity of starting with a decreasing sequence of closed intervals and the implications of using sequences of real numbers.

cragar
Messages
2,546
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


Start with the Bolzano-Weiertrass theorem and use it to construct a proof of the Nested Interval Property.

Homework Equations


Bolzano-Weiertrass: Every bounded sequence contains a convergent sub-sequence
Nested Interval Property: Closed intervals nested inside of each other forever is non-empty.

The Attempt at a Solution


If we start with a bounded sequence on a closed interval and then we make it smaller we have a smaller portion of the sequence and so this smaller part must converge to something and we just keep making the interval smaller and we squeeze it down to a point, the sequence must converge to this point because it is the only point in the sequence.
Can I just start with some interval and slowly make it approach the middle by having it increase from the right and decrease to the left till I just have enclosed one point and make it converge to this point.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
to use B-W to prove the Nested Interval Property, you don't want to "start with a sequence". you want to start with an arbitrary family of nested closed intervals.

can you think of a way to create a bounded sequence from such a family?

if so, then you can say: by B-W, we know that...
 
When we start with a family of nested closed intervals, By the B-w, we know that there should be a convergent point among these family of intervals.
 
you can only apply B-W if you have a bounded sequence. what is your bounded sequence?
 
Do I just say I have some generic sequence A and that it is bounded between some interval.
 
Since you're proving the nested intervals thing, you need to start with an arbitrary decreasing sequence of closed intervals. If you're going for a proof that involves sequences of real numbers, you will have to use the sequence of intervals to define a sequence of real numbers.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
8K