riseofphoenix
- 294
- 2
:(:(
The discussion revolves around determining the thickness of an oil film given its index of refraction and that of water, along with the wavelength of light. The original poster expresses confusion about the relevance of the wavelength and the concept of phase reversal in the context of interference patterns.
Participants are engaging with the original poster's calculations and questions. Some provide insights into the concepts of phase reversal and constructive interference, while others encourage the poster to clarify their calculations further. There is an ongoing exploration of the underlying principles without a clear consensus on the original poster's understanding.
The original poster appears to be working under constraints of homework guidelines, which may limit the depth of explanation they can receive. They are grappling with foundational concepts in optics related to interference and refraction.
tiny-tim said:hi riseofphoenix!
show us your full calculations, and then we'll see what went wrong, and we'll know how to help!![]()
riseofphoenix said:Question 1: why did they give me this if i didn't have to use it?
Question 2: what do they mean by the term "first order"? I never understand :(
I don't understand their explanation though :(:(:(
Particularly this part: "Since nair < nair < nwater, light reflected from both top and bottom surfaces of the oil film experiences phase reversal."
Question 3: What's phase reversal??
Question 4: And why is this considered "constructive interference"? :(