Given acceleration graph, determine v vs. t and x vs. t graph?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around interpreting an acceleration graph to determine the corresponding velocity and displacement graphs over time, starting from initial conditions of zero for time, position, and velocity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between acceleration, velocity, and displacement, questioning the implications of the graph's shape and the meaning of negative values. Some suggest measuring areas under the graph to find velocity, while others reflect on their understanding of kinematic equations and the nature of displacement when velocity is zero.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, offering different perspectives on how to interpret the acceleration graph. Some have provided guidance on measuring areas and considering the implications of negative velocity on displacement, while others are reflecting on their previous misunderstandings.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on using kinematic equations and graph interpretation, with some participants noting confusion regarding the graph's curvature and the implications of negative values for velocity and displacement.

timnswede
Messages
100
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The title, and assume that t=0, x=0 and v=0.

Homework Equations


Kinematic equations, and area of triangle and rectangle.

The Attempt at a Solution


2o5h9Bo.png

I see what I did wrong with the part that is circled "parabola", as it should be just a straight line, but I am lost as to what is wrong at the part that is circled "curved up". It's speeding up during that part so wouldn't it make sense that the slope is steepest at the top of that section?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Instead of guessing, why don't you divide up the time between 10 and 25 secs and on your velocity graph "count squares" for each increment in area as you step through time?

And where you have the velocity steady at 0 m/s for a number of seconds, what will be happening to your displacement over that interval?

There's no excuse for guessing when you can measure directly off the graphs! :cool:
 
I think I see what I did wrong, it should go all the way down -375, then a straight line, and then curved down again another 84.375 m right? This was using kinematic equations. So from 10 to 25 seconds it would be curved up, but instead of going towards the positive x it would keep going negative? And when velocity is 0 displacement doesn't change. This is a rough sketch of what it would look like.
pDhEI5E.png
 
timnswede said:
I think I see what I did wrong, it should go all the way down -375, then a straight line, and then curved down again another 84.375 m right? This was using kinematic equations. So from 10 to 25 seconds it would be curved up, but instead of going towards the positive x it would keep going negative? And when velocity is 0 displacement doesn't change. This is a rough sketch of what it would look like.
You are right that the displacement is negative all the time, as the velocity is negative.
But think of the equation for displacement, when the initial velocity is zero: x=a/2 t2. It is a parabola, upward open when a >0 and upside down when a<0. Check the curvatures.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: timnswede
Ah OK, that makes sense. I think I was too caught up with velocity being negative. The way you said I should do it makes it much easier though, thank you.
 
Are you going to post another sketch?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
9K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K