Given any real numbers a and b such that a<b, prove that for any natural number n

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that for any real numbers a and b where a < b, there exist real numbers x1, x2, ..., xn such that a < x1 < x2 < ... < xn < b for any natural number n. The original poster expresses confusion regarding the hint provided, which suggests a recursive definition for the sequence of numbers.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of the recursive definition given in the hint, questioning how it leads to the desired inequalities. Some express uncertainty about the meaning of the hint and its application to the proof.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the hint and attempting to clarify their understanding of the recursive definitions. Some have begun to calculate specific values based on examples, while others are emphasizing the need to prove the results using induction.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on the requirement to prove the statement by induction for any natural number n, and participants are discussing the implications of specific examples they have chosen.

snes_nerd
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Given any real numbers a and b such that a < b, prove that for any natural number n, there are real numbers x1, x2, x3, ... , xn such that a < x1 < x2 < x3 < ... < xn < b.

The hint I was given says : Define xi recursively by x1 = (a+b)/2 and x(i+1) = (xi +b)/2. Prove that xi < xi + 1 < b, and use this result to prove by induction that a < x1 < x2 < x3 < ... < xn < b for any n in the natural numbers.

Okay so the hint doesn't really help me at all but I think I have an idea of what the question is asking. Let's suppose a = 1 and b= 10. Then there are natural numbers between these such that 1 < ... < 10. So going back to the original proposition I could say that there are real numbers x1, x2, x3, ..., xn such that a < x1 < x2 < x3 < .. < xn < x(n+1) < b. Not really sure where to go from their.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Okay so the hint doesn't really help me at all

The hint is a fairly explicit statement of how to solve the problem to be honest. It's worth going over it and identifying what is confusing you about it
 


I am sure it is very straightforward once I actually know what it means. In fact, its probably really easy. I feel kind of dumb not seeing it, and I am sure once I see it, I will feel even more dumb.

Maybe its because I don't understand why x1 = (a+b)/2 and (xi+b)/2. (a+b)/2 tells me a number between a and b, and (xi+b)/2 tells me another number between a and b that's greater then x1. Cant really connect this to the proof
 


So if x1=(a+b)/2 and x2=(x1_b)/2 we have:

a<x1<x2<b

and if x3=(x2+b)/2 what do we have?
 


snes_nerd said:
Given any real numbers a and b such that a < b, prove that for any natural number n, there are real numbers x1, x2, x3, ... , xn such that a < x1 < x2 < x3 < ... < xn < b.

The hint I was given says : Define xi recursively by x1 = (a+b)/2 and x(i+1) = (xi +b)/2. Prove that xi < xi + 1 < b, and use this result to prove by induction that a < x1 < x2 < x3 < ... < xn < b for any n in the natural numbers.

Okay so the hint doesn't really help me at all but I think I have an idea of what the question is asking. Let's suppose a = 1 and b= 10. Then there are natural numbers between these such that 1 < ... < 10. So going back to the original proposition I could say that there are real numbers x1, x2, x3, ..., xn such that a < x1 < x2 < x3 < .. < xn < x(n+1) < b. Not really sure where to go from there.
...
For your example in which a=0 and b= 10: What are the values you get for x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, etc. ?
 


So x3=(x2+b)/2 implies that a < x1 < x2 < x3 < b?.
 


snes_nerd said:
So x3=(x2+b)/2 implies that a < x1 < x2 < x3 < b?.
Be more specific.

Using the hint, and a=0, b=10:
x1 = (a+b)/2 = 5

x2 = (x1+b)/2 = 7.5

x3 = (x2+b)/2 = 8.75

...​
 


If a< b then a+ b< 2b so (a+ b)/2< b.

If a< b then 2a< a+ b so a< (a+ b)/2.

a< (a+ b)/2< b.

Yes, that's the whole point of an "average"- it lies between the numbers.
 


Proof

If a < b, then a + b < 2b (axiom or reasoning I can assume this?)

Then with simple algebra, (a+b)/2 < b (definition of multiplicative inverse)

If a < b, then 2a < a + b (axiom or reasoning I can assume this?)

Then a < (a+b)/2 ( definition of multiplicative inverse

Thus, a < (a+b)/2 < b

Okay that makes sense but this problem has to be solved with induction. And Sammy 0 and 10 is not in the actual problem. I was just throwing an example out. I still have to prove with induction that xi < xi+1 < b. It does make sense this way though although I HAVE to show it with induction for any n in the natural numbers.
 
  • #10


snes_nerd said:
...

Okay that makes sense but this problem has to be solved with induction. And Sammy 0 and 10 is not in the actual problem. I was just throwing an example out. I still have to prove with induction that xi < xi+1 < b. It does make sense this way though although I HAVE to show it with induction for any n in the natural numbers.
And I was trying to point out how to use your example to help you understand how the hint that was given could be useful.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K