Gof is injection, does this imply that f is an injection

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dustinsfl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Injection
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between the injectivity of composite functions and the injectivity of their constituent functions, specifically examining whether the injectivity of g(f(x)) implies that f is also injective.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of assuming f is not injective and whether this leads to a contradiction with the injectivity of g(f(x)). There is a suggestion to clarify definitions related to injectivity as a starting point for the proof.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing guidance on how to approach the proof and emphasizing the importance of understanding definitions. There is no explicit consensus on a method, but suggestions for proof strategies and clarifications are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express concerns about the lack of attempts shared by the original poster, indicating a preference for seeing initial reasoning or attempts to facilitate better assistance.

Dustinsfl
Messages
2,217
Reaction score
5
Let A,B, and C be nonempty sets and lef f map A to B and g map B to C.

If g of f maps A to C is an injection, then f is an injection.

Not sure how to do this proof
 
Physics news on Phys.org


It seems like you always start out your posts with something like "Not sure how to do this proof" without attempting it. Why don't you assume f is NOT an injection and see if it leads to a contradiction with g of f being an injection?
 


Of course, because if I knew how to start it or do it, I wouldn't ask.
 


Dustinsfl said:
Of course, because if I knew how to start it or do it, I wouldn't ask.

Sure, if you knew how to do it you wouldn't need to ask. But could you thrash around with attempts a little? Other people do.
 


You are making an assumption that I haven't. I don't post a futile attempt at it that doesn't go anywhere. With computations for classes like DE and Calc, posting the work allows others to identify errors. I can post work associated with a proof that leads no where so whomever helps would have to start from scratch anyways.
 


Dustinsfl said:
You are making an assumption that I haven't. I don't post a futile attempt at it that doesn't go anywhere. With computations for classes like DE and Calc, posting the work allows others to identify errors. I can post work associated with a proof that leads no where so whomever helps would have to start from scratch anyways.

I'm not making the assumption you haven't done anything. I'm just saying you don't tell us what you've tried. That is not valueless even if it didn't work. Check out post 2. Try a proof by contradiction.
 


Dustinsfl said:
Of course, because if I knew how to start it or do it, I wouldn't ask.

More often then not, my students do not know how to start because they are forgetting definitions. One tip I always give my students is to simply write down the definitions of the key words in the problem if you do not know how to start. The is almost always the first thing to try regardless of the problem, and regardless of whether you know how to start.

Since you are asked to show [tex]f[/tex] is injective, you need to know what "injective" means. Write down exactly what it means for a function to be injective.

Some math books define injective as: A map [tex]f:A\to B[/tex] is injective if [tex]f(a_1) = f(a_2)[/tex] implies [tex]a_1 = a_2[/tex]. This is what you have to prove: that [tex]f(a_1) = f(a_2) \implies a_1=a_2[/tex]

What are you given? You are given that [tex]g \circ f : A\to C[/tex] is injective. What does this mean according to the definition of "injective"? (see the definition above, but apply it to [tex]g\circ f[/tex] as opposed to just [tex]f[/tex]). It may help to switch from [tex]g\circ f[/tex] notation to [tex]g(f(x))[/tex] notation.

Can you then use the given information to deduce what you need to show?
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K