I Going Up-Down Elevator G-forces vs Bouncing off a Spring G-force

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter ESponge2000
  • Start date Start date
ESponge2000
Messages
158
Reaction score
4
TL;DR Summary
In GR terms,
Riding Up-down elevator … during de-acceleration relative to ground and acceleration up…
G force exceeds 1

The same change in velocity relative to ground but at the top of a tower is where G<1

In GR you’re always forced by earth out of your geodesic except if the de-acceleration at the top or acceleration down from the top is made the same as if the elevator fell off the track and was loose

But now with spring/trampoline im reading that the experience at the bottom differs
When “bungee jumping” or trampoline is it correct that the G force would not behave the same on the upward bouncing up due to how the spring stores potential energy or absorbs energy at compression ? Or is your motion up and down when supported by a spring medhanism the same as would be in the elevator motor?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ESponge2000 said:
But now with spring/trampoline im reading that the experience at the bottom differs
Reading where?

And what does this all have to do with GR?

Sounds like you confused about some basic Newtonian mechanics.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters
ESponge2000 said:
Ai Says
There's your problem. LLMs aren't good at physics.

A lift motor will usually be controlled to minimise discomfort to its passengers. If you bounce off a spring the force is what it is. So a lift will generally smoothly vary the force towards zero as it approaches a stop. A spring will not.

As A.T. says, this has nothing to do with GR.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters and Dale
ESponge2000 said:
Ai Says ...
Read a physics book instead.
 
ESponge2000 said:
Ai Says
Ignore anything that AI says regarding physics. We are glad to help you understand valid sources, but AI is not a valid source at this time and it currently generates bad information far faster than we can correct it.

Thread closed.
 
ESponge2000 said:
Ai Says that....
And the forum rules say that "AI-generated text apps like ChatGPT are not valid sources."
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top