• Support PF! Buy your school textbooks, materials and every day products Here!

Goldstein classical mechanics discrepancy?

  • Thread starter Syrus
  • Start date
  • #1
214
0

Homework Statement



In Goldstein's text, he discusses conservative fields and then states that "friction or dissipative forces are never conservative since F dot ds is always positive."

From what I recall, most frictional interactions occur in directions opposite the displacement, and would, hence, result in negative values of the dot product. Shouldn't, then, the text read isntead: friction or dissipative forces are never conservative since F dot ds is always non-zero?

I have checked a few other classical mechanics texts and they all seem to have statements along the same lines- so I feel there is a detail I am missing here.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
TSny
Homework Helper
Gold Member
12,492
2,922
I still have my 1st edition of Goldstein that I used in a course 42 years ago. I found the quote on page 3 and lo and behold I see that I had circled the word "positive" and added a question mark in the margin! I think Goldstein meant to use the word "negative" here (even though you can construct scenarios where a force of friction does positive work).
 
  • #3
214
0
That's remarkable TSny, thanks for checking!
 

Related Threads on Goldstein classical mechanics discrepancy?

  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
1K
Top